Document Type : Research Article
Authors
Arak University
Abstract
Keywords
|
Mechanics of Advanced Composite Structures 4 (2017) 127-137 |
|
Semnan University |
Mechanics of Advanced Composite Structures journal homepage: http://MACS.journals.semnan.ac.ir |
Free Vibration Analysis of Size-Dependent, Functionally Graded, Rectangular Nano/Micro-plates based on Modified Nonlinear Couple Stress Shear Deformation Plate Theories
K. Khorshidi a,b*, A. Fallah a
a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arak University, Arak, Iran
b Institute of Nanosciences & Nanotechnolgy, Arak University, Arak, Iran
Paper INFO |
|
ABSTRACT |
Paper history: Received 2016-12-17 Revised 2017-02-07 Accepted 2017-03-01 |
In the present study, a vibration analysis of functionally graded rectangular nano-/microplates was considered based on modified nonlinear coupled stress exponential and trigonometric shear deformation plate theories. Modified coupled stress theory is a non-classical continuum mechanics theory. In this theory, a material-length scale parameter is applied to account for the effect of nanostructure size that earlier classical plate theories are not able to explain. The material properties of the plate were assumed to vary according to a power-law form in the thickness direction. The governing equation of the motion of functionally graded, rectangular nano-/microplates with different boundary conditions were obtained based on the Rayleigh-Ritz method using complete algebraic polynomial displacement and rotation functions. The advantage of the present Rayleigh-Ritz method is that it can easily handle the different conditions at the boundaries of moderately thick rectangular plates (e.g., clamped, simply supported, and free). A comparison of the results with those available in the literature has been made. Finally, the effect of various parameters, such as the power-law index, thickness-to-length scale parameter ratio h/l, and aspect ratio a/b, on the natural frequency of nano/micro-plates are presented and discussed in detail. |
|
|
||
Keywords: Rayleigh-Ritz Vibration Couple stress theory Functionally graded |
||
DOI: 10.22075/MACS.2017.1800.1094 |
© 2017 Published by Semnan University Press. All rights reserved. |
The potential and applications of nano-/micromaterials in the development of technologies such as electronics, energy, environmental remediation, nano-/microsystem, medical and health, future transportation, etc. are important factors that encourage scientists to choose it for future projects. Today, scientists and engineers can reduce production costs, energy consumption, and maintenance with the aid of nanotechnology and its integration with other technologies. Also, using nano-/microtechnology has increased the durability of engineering structures.
Generally, size-dependent material models can be developed based on size-dependent continuum theories like classical couple stress theory [1], nonlocal elasticity theory [2], and strain gradient theory [3]. Couple stress theory is one of the higher-order continuum theories that contains material-length scale parameters and can cover the size effects of nano-/microstructures.
Functionally graded materials (FGMs) are heterogeneous composite materials in which the material properties vary continuously from one surface to the other surface. This is achieved by gradually varying the volume fraction of mixture materials. The merit of using these materials is that they can survive high thermal gradient environments. FGMs were first used as thermal barrier materials for aerospace structural applications and fusion reactors. Recently, they have been developed for general application as structural components in high-temperature environments [4]. Typically, an FGM is a mixture of ceramic and metal for the purpose of thermal protection against large temperature gradients. The ceramic material provides high-temperature resistance due to its low thermal conductivity, while the ductile metal prevents fracture due to its greater toughness. Because of the wide use of nano-/microplates in engineering applications, the study of functionally graded (FG), rectangular nano-/microplates has received considerable attention in recent years.
Matsunaga [5] analyzed the natural frequencies and buckling stresses of plates made of FG materials by taking into account the effects of transverse shear, normal deformations, and rotatory inertia. By expanding the power series of displacement components, a set of FG plates was derived using Hamilton’s principle. Salehipour et al. [6] have developed a model for static and vibrating FG nano-/microplates based on the modified couple stress and three-dimensional elasticity theories. Ansari et al. [7] investigated the size-dependent vibrational behavior of FG, rectangular, Mindlin microplates, including geometrical nonlinearity. In their work, the FG Mindlin microplate was considered to be made of a mixture of metal and ceramic according to a power-law distribution. Kim and Reddy [8] have presented analytical solutions of a general third-order plate theory that accounts for the power-law distribution of two materials through thickness- and microstructure-dependent size effects. Thai and Vo [9] proposed a size-dependent model for the bending and free vibration of an FG plate based on the modified couple stress theory and sinusoidal shear deformation theory. Shaat et al. [10] developed a new Kirchhoff plate model using a modified couple stress theory to study the bending behavior of nanosized plates, including surface energy and microstructure effects. Lou and He [11] studied the nonlinear bending and free vibration responses of a simply supported, FG microplate lying on an elastic foundation within the framework of the modified couple stress theory, the Kirchhoff/Mindlin plate theory, and von Karman’s geometric nonlinearity. He et al. [12] developed a new, size-dependent model for FG microplates by using the modified couple stress theory. Based on the strain gradient elasticity theory and a refined shear deformation theory, Zhang et al. [13] developed an efficient, size-dependent plate model to analyze the bending, buckling, and free vibration problems of FG microplates resting on an elastic foundation. Lou et al. [14] proposed a unified higher-order plate theory for FG microplates by adopting the modified couple stress theory to capture size effects and using a generalized shape function to characterize the transverse shear deformation. Thai and Kim [15] developed a size-dependent model of the bending and free vibration of an FG Reddy plate. Gupta et al. [16] presented an analytical model for the vibration analysis of partially cracked isotropic and FG, rectangular plates based on a modified couple stress theory. Li and Pan [17] developed a size-dependent, FG, piezoelectric microplate model based on the modified couple stress and sinusoidal plate theories. Nguyen et al. [18] studied the size-dependent behaviours of FG microplates using a novel quasi-3D shear deformation theory based on modified couple stress theory. Lei et al. [19] presented a size-dependent FG microplate model based on a modified couple stress theory requiring only one material-length scale parameter. Jandaghian and Rahmani [20] investigated the free vibration analysis of FG, piezoelectric-material, nanoscale plates based on Eringen's nonlocal Kirchhoff plate theory under simply supported–edge conditions. Şimşeka and Aydınc [21] considered the static bending and forced vibration of an imperfect FG microplate carrying a moving load based on Mindlin plate theory and the modified couple stress theory. Thai and Choi [22] presented an analytical solution for size-dependent models for the bending, buckling, and vibration of FG Kirchhoff and Mindlin plates based on modified couple stress theory. Khorshidi et al. [23], investigated the free vibrations of size-dependent, FG, rectangular plates with simply supported–boundary conditions based on nonlocal, exponential shear deformation theory using a Navier-type solution. Khorshidi and Fallah [24] analyzed the buckling response of FG, rectangular nanoplates with all edges simply supported based on nonlocal, exponential shear deformation theory according to Navier-type solutions. Khorshidi and Khodadadi [25] used a new, refined trigonometric shear deformation plate theory to study the out-of-plane vibration of rectangular, isotropic plates with different boundary conditions. Reddy and Kim [26] adopted a higher-order shear deformation theory to develop a size-dependent model for FG microplates. Simsek and Reddy [27] examined the bending and free vibration of microbeams based on various higher-order beam theories. Using first-order plate theory, Jung et al. [28, 29] investigated the buckling, static deformation, and free vibration of sigmoid, FG-material nano-/microplates embedded in a Pasternak elastic foundation.
The free vibration problem of plates can be solved using either the energy functional or the governing partial differential equations. Both can be taken by using standard analytical and numerical techniques. Among the techniques available are the finite element method [30], the boundary element method [31], the finite difference method [32], the differential quadrature method [33], the collocation method [34], the Galerkin method [35], and the Ritz method [36–39]. In this article, a modified couple stress theory according to the nonlinear exponential and trigonometric shear deformation theories was applied to analyze the free vibration of FG, rectangular nano-/microplates. The natural frequencies of the FG nano-/microplates were calculated using the Rayleigh-Ritz method based on minimizing the Rayleigh quotient. The novelty of the present paper is that the analytical solution was developed for size-dependent, FG, rectangular nano-/microplates using the modified nonlinear couple stress shear deformation theories for a combination of different boundary conditions (i.e., simply supported [S], clamped [C], and free [F]), as follows: SSSS, SCSS, SCSC, SSSF, SFSF, SCSF, CCCC, SSCC, SCCC, CFCF, SSFF, CFSF, CFFF, SFCS, CFCC, SFCC, FFCC, CFCS, CSFF, SFFF, and FFFF. A comparison of the results with those available in the literature has been made. Finally, the effect of various parameters such as the power-law index, thickness-to-length scale parameter ratio (h/l), and aspect ratio (a/b) on the natural frequencies of nano-/microplates are presented and discussed in detail.
Consider a size-dependent, rectangular nano-/microplate with uniform thickness h, length a, and width b made up of FG material as shown in Fig. 1. The properties of the nano-/microplate are assumed to vary through the thickness of the nanoplate according to a power-law distribution of the volume fractions of two materials between the two surfaces. The top surface ( ) of the size-dependent plate is fully ceramic, whereas the bottom surface ( ) is fully metal. The plate regions are given by Eq. (1) as follows:
, , |
(1) |
where , and are Cartesian coordinates. Poisson’s ratio of the plate ϑ is assumed to be constant for ceramic and metal throughout the analysis.
Young’s modulus and mass density are assumed to vary continuously through the plate thickness direction as
, |
(2) |
, |
(3) |
, |
(4) |
where the subscripts m and c represent the metallic and ceramic constituents, respectively; is the plate density per unit area of the FG plate; is the Young's modulus of the FG plate; is the volume fraction; and g is the power-law index and takes only positive values.
Figure 1. Rectangular plate geometry, dimensions, and coordinate system |
According to Eqs. (2) and (3), when the power-law index g approaches zero or infinity, the plate is fully ceramic or metal, respectively. According to the following assumptions, the displacement field of the proposed plate theory is given as follows:
(a) A displacement component similar to displacement in classical plate theory.
(b) A displacement component due to shear deformation, which is assumed to be exponential in exponential shear deformation theory and trigonometric in trigonometric shear deformation theory with respect to the thickness coordinate.
Based on the assumptions mentioned above, the displacement field can be described as
, |
(5) |
, |
(6) |
, |
(7) |
where, for exponential shear deformation plate theory, , and for trigonometric shear deformation plate theory, [23–25]. Also , , and are the displacement in the , , and directions, respectively; and are the mid-plane displacements; and and are the rotation functions. With the assumed linear von Karman strain, the displacement-strain field will be as follows [22]:
, |
(8) |
, |
(9) |
, |
(10) |
, |
(11) |
. |
(12) |
In the Eqs. (8–12), are normal strains and are shear strains. Considering Hooke's law for stress fields, the normal stress is assumed to be negligible in comparison within plane stresses and . Thus, the stress-strain relationship will be as follows:
, |
(13) |
, |
(14) |
, |
(15) |
, |
(16) |
(17) |
where is the shear modulus of the plate.
In the modified couple stress theory, the strain energy of a linearly elastic continuum body on volume ∀ is defined by a function of both strain tensor and curvature tensor as
, |
(18) |
where , and are the components of the stress, normal strains, and shear strain tensors, respectively [1]. Also, are the components of the deviatoric part of the symmetric couple stress tensor, and are the components of the symmetric curvature tensor defined by
, |
(19) |
, |
(20) |
where is the length scale parameter, and are the components of the rotation vector related to the displacement field. These are defined as follows:
, |
(21) |
, |
(22) |
. |
(23) |
The kinetic energy of the FG nano-/microplate is defined as follows:
, |
(24) |
where the dot-top index contract indicates the differentiation with respect to the time variable.
In this section, the Rayleigh-Ritz method is employed to analyze the free vibration of the FG, rectangular nano-/microplates using coupled stess theory. In the Rayleigh-Ritz method, the admissible trial displacement and rotation functions can be introduced as follows [34]:
, |
(25) |
, |
(26) |
, |
(27) |
, |
(28) |
, |
(29) |
where , , , and are the generalized constant coefficients of the admissible trial functions; is the natural frequency of the plate; is the imaginary number; is the order of approximation; and are the fundamental functions. The fundamental functions of the moderately thick, FG, rectangular nano-/microplates that satisfy the geometric boundary conditions are introduced as
. |
(30) |
The fundamental functions for different boundary conditions of the moderately thick, FG, rectangular nano-/microplates that were considered in the present study are listed in Table 1. In the Rayleigh-Ritz approach, the Lagrangian function of the system is given as
. |
(31) |
With the application of the Rayleigh-Ritz minimization method, the eigenvalue equation can be derived from Eq. (32).
, |
(32) |
where is the vector of generalized coordinates and contains an unknown, undetermined coefficient. Eq. (32) can be written in matrix form as below:
, |
(33) |
where
, , |
(34) |
is the stiffness matrix, and is the mass matrix. This eigenvalue problem is solved to obtain the natural frequency parameters and vibration modal shapes of the FG, rectangular nano-/microplate.
Table 1. Fundamental functions of the admissible trial displacement and rotation functions for different combinations of boundary conditions |
|||||
Boundary Conditions |
Fundamental Functions |
||||
SSSS |
|||||
SCSS |
|||||
SCSC |
|||||
SSSF |
|||||
SFSF |
|||||
SCSF |
|||||
CCCC |
|||||
SSCC |
|||||
SCCC |
|||||
CFCF |
|||||
SSFF |
|||||
CFSF |
|||||
CFFF |
|||||
SFCS |
|||||
CFCC |
|||||
SFCC |
|||||
FFCC |
|||||
CFCS |
|||||
CSFF |
|||||
SFFF |
|||||
FFFF |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
In this section, the natural frequency parameters are obtained from the Rayleigh-Ritz method, presented here, and expressed in dimensionless form as . Numerical calculations have been performed for different combinations of boundary conditions (SSSS, SCSS, SCSC, SSSF, SFSF, SCSF, CCCC, SSCC, SCCC, CFCF, SSFF, CFSF, CFFF, SFCS, CFCC, SFCC, FFCC, CFCS, CSFF, SFFF, FFFF). In the numerical calculations, Poisson’s ratio has been used. The FG nano-/microplate is made up of the following material properties: , , , and the small scale parameter is .
Table 2 shows a comparison study of the nondimensional natural frequency parameters ( ) for a simply supported, FG, square nano-/microplate with those reported based on Mindlin plate theory by Thai and Choi [22]. The effect of the length scale parameter and length-to-thickness ratio a/h on the first two nondimensional natural frequency parameters for simply supported, FG, rectangular nano-/microplates with a/b = 1 and different power-law indices are shown in Table 2.
From the results shown in Table 2, it can be observed that the present results, which were obtained by the Rayleigh-Ritz method, have greater values than those reported by Thai and Choi [22]. This is because in the Rayleigh-Ritz method, the admissible trial displacement and rotation functions that can satisfy the different boundary conditions at all edges of the plate are in the form of a finite polynomial series. Reducing the number of series terms decreases the degree of freedom of the plate and increases the stiffness and frequency parameter, in contrast with what was reported in Thai and Choi’s work based on the Navier method (exact solution) [22]. Moreover, the different distribution of shear stress and rotary inertia in the thickness direction led to differences in the gained results, which are explained by the exponential, trigonometric, and first-order shear deformation plate theories. The results in Table 2 show that there is a good agreement between the present results and those of Thai and Choi [22].
Tables 3 and 4 show the effect of different boundary conditions, power-law index ( , 1, and 10) and aspect ratios (a/b = 0.2, 0.5, and 1) on the dimensionless natural frequency ( ) of FG, rectangular nano-/microplates using the exponential and trigonometric shear deformation plate theories. From the results presented in Tables 3 and 4, it can be observed that an increasing aspect ratio (a/b) leads to an increase in the dimensionless natural frequency parameters because decreasing the width of a plate with a constant length decreases the degrees of freedom of the plate and increases the stiffness.
Table 2. Comparison of nondimensional natural frequency of an FG nano-/microplate with all edges simply supported |
|||||||||||
TSDT |
ESDT |
Ref. [22] |
TSDT |
ESDT |
Ref. [22] |
TSDT |
ESDT |
Ref. [22] |
|||
5 |
0 |
5.48130 |
5.48140 |
5.38710 |
4.99490 |
4.99510 |
4.87440 |
5.66210 |
5.66230 |
5.58180 |
|
12.1209 |
12.1214 |
11.6717 |
10.9028 |
10.9035 |
10.7905 |
12.2316 |
12.2316 |
11.9931 |
|||
11.2690 |
11.2692 |
11.1311 |
11.2779 |
11.2784 |
4.0451 |
11.2364 |
11.2364 |
11.1666 |
|||
23.9416 |
23.9418 |
23.7023 |
23.8609 |
23.8615 |
23.6723 |
23.8985 |
23.8987 |
23.7146 |
|||
10 |
0 |
6.21220 |
6.21220 |
5.93010 |
5.39620 |
5.39630 |
5.26970 |
5.13090 |
5.13120 |
5.09030 |
|
14.2254 |
14.2256 |
14.0893 |
12.7138 |
12.7139 |
12.6460 |
14.6621 |
14.6625 |
14.6464 |
|||
12.9139 |
12.9143 |
12.6360 |
12.6693 |
12.6693 |
12.4128 |
12.7405 |
12.7409 |
12.7302 |
|||
29.6572 |
29.6576 |
29.4588 |
29.1949 |
29.1953 |
29.1174 |
30.0109 |
30.0113 |
29.6008 |
|||
20 |
0 |
6.35950 |
6.35960 |
6.09970 |
5.55870 |
5.5590 |
5.38800 |
6.56880 |
6.56910 |
6.38370 |
|
15.1465 |
15.1466 |
15.0319 |
13.4209 |
13.4210 |
13.3192 |
15.8744 |
15.8748 |
15.7108 |
|||
13.4285 |
13.4287 |
13.1786 |
13.2017 |
13.2020 |
12.8871 |
13.3998 |
13.3999 |
13.3030 |
|||
32.5074 |
32.4947 |
32.4952 |
32.2374 |
31.6689 |
31.6689 |
31.6012 |
32.6132 |
32.6133 |
Table 3. Comparison of the fundamental nondimensional natural frequency parameter for SSSS, SCSS, SCSC, SSSF, SFSF, SCSF, CCCC, SSCC, SFCC, and FFCC, FG, square nano-/microplates for different aspect ratios and power-law index values |
|||||||
ESDT |
TSDT |
a/b |
B.Cs. |
||||
7.03770 |
6.70340 |
6.74270 |
7.03750 |
6.70330 |
6.74260 |
0.2 |
SSSS |
9.77880 |
7.85750 |
7.92220 |
9.77850 |
7.85740 |
7.92210 |
0.5 |
|
12.9404 |
12.8693 |
12.9143 |
12.9402 |
12.8691 |
12.9141 |
1 |
|
7.05570 |
6.72190 |
6.76450 |
7.05530 |
6.72160 |
6.76440 |
0.2 |
SCSS |
9.38490 |
5.76980 |
8.46440 |
9.38480 |
5.76960 |
8.46420 |
0.5 |
|
14.7465 |
14.0618 |
14.3214 |
14.7463 |
14.0617 |
14.3211 |
1 |
|
7.07760 |
6.74540 |
6.79230 |
7.07760 |
6.74500 |
6.79180 |
0.2 |
SCSC |
15.6274 |
14.8164 |
15.6684 |
15.6274 |
14.8162 |
15.6683 |
0.5 |
|
18.1387 |
17.3800 |
17.7942 |
18.1385 |
17.3798 |
17.7941 |
1 |
|
1.12700 |
1.09390 |
1.10290 |
1.12500 |
1.09340 |
1.10260 |
0.2 |
SSSF |
8.72160 |
8.34450 |
8.24750 |
8.72150 |
8.34450 |
8.24740 |
0.5 |
|
8.72160 |
8.24750 |
8.34450 |
8.72150 |
8.24750 |
8.34410 |
1 |
|
0.27100 |
0.24870 |
0.25730 |
0.27090 |
0.24870 |
0.25680 |
0.2 |
SFSF |
1.78370 |
1.53100 |
1.70780 |
1.78350 |
1.53900 |
1.70760 |
0.5 |
|
7.51420 |
7.19320 |
7.28030 |
7.51360 |
7.19290 |
7.28010 |
1 |
|
2.79750 |
2.71570 |
2.77240 |
2.79740 |
2.71550 |
2.77230 |
0.2 |
SCSF |
4.40560 |
4.25520 |
4.32510 |
4.40540 |
4.25510 |
4.32500 |
0.5 |
|
9.21430 |
9.04810 |
9.17290 |
9.21430 |
9.04800 |
9.17270 |
1 |
|
15.0082 |
14.4513 |
14.8819 |
15.0081 |
14.4513 |
14.8817 |
0.2 |
CCCC |
15.9753 |
15.3828 |
15.7562 |
15.9753 |
15.3826 |
15.7562 |
0.5 |
|
23.9918 |
2.35750 |
23.4679 |
23.9911 |
2.35710 |
23.4676 |
1 |
|
10.5243 |
10.1382 |
10.3519 |
10.5238 |
10.1382 |
10.3518 |
0.2 |
SSCC |
11.4301 |
10.9700 |
11.2156 |
11.4295 |
10.9700 |
11.2156 |
0.5 |
|
17.3995 |
16.8890 |
17.2510 |
17.3994 |
16.8890 |
17.2500 |
1 |
|
2.85220 |
2.76970 |
2.82770 |
2.85210 |
2.76970 |
2.82760 |
0.2 |
SFCC |
5.04160 |
4.88120 |
4.98250 |
5.04160 |
4.88110 |
4.98240 |
0.5 |
|
13.1621 |
12.7617 |
13.0365 |
13.1615 |
12.7611 |
13.0364 |
1 |
|
2.50770 |
2.42680 |
2.48490 |
2.50750 |
2.42670 |
2.48450 |
0.2 |
FFCC |
3.14900 |
3.05610 |
3.12160 |
3.14700 |
3.05580 |
3.12170 |
0.5 |
|
5.29150 |
5.18080 |
5.25770 |
5.29150 |
5.18070 |
5.25760 |
1 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of the fundamental nondimensional natural frequency parameter for CFCS, CFCF, SSFF, CFSF, CFFF, SCCC, CFCC, SFCS, CSFF, SFFF, and FFFF, FG, square nano-/microplates for different aspect ratios and power-law index values. |
|||||||
ESDT |
TSDT |
a/b |
B.C |
||||
* |
|||||||
1.35310 |
1.31750 |
1.33920 |
1.35290 |
1.31710 |
1.33890 |
0.2 |
CFCS |
5.05720 |
4.89360 |
4.99820 |
5.05700 |
4.89340 |
4.99810 |
0.5 |
|
17.8132 |
17.3941 |
17.7298 |
17.8126 |
17.3940 |
17.7295 |
1 |
|
0.65900 |
0.69230 |
0.65680 |
0.65800 |
0.69230 |
0.65660 |
0.2 |
CFCF |
4.32290 |
4.18700 |
4.28060 |
4.32290 |
4.18690 |
4.27970 |
0.5 |
|
19.8915 |
16.8847 |
19.7786 |
19.8914 |
16.8847 |
19.7784 |
1 |
|
0.20740 |
0.54510 |
0.55020 |
0.20700 |
0.54510 |
0.54950 |
0.2 |
SSFF |
1.40520 |
1.36300 |
1.37260 |
1.40500 |
1.36100 |
1.37250 |
0.5 |
|
2.95410 |
2.78790 |
2.83330 |
2.95380 |
2.78790 |
2.83340 |
1 |
|
0.44400 |
0.42000 |
0.43520 |
0.44380 |
0.41960 |
0.43440 |
0.2 |
CFSF |
2.89690 |
2.78050 |
2.85190 |
2.89660 |
2.78050 |
2.85180 |
0.5 |
|
11.8647 |
11.4962 |
11.7224 |
11.8645 |
11.4958 |
11.7223 |
1 |
|
0.19600 |
0.09900 |
0.10260 |
0.19550 |
0.09840 |
0.10220 |
0.2 |
CFFF |
0.67300 |
0.64800 |
0.66570 |
0.67290 |
0.64780 |
0.66530 |
0.5 |
|
2.84280 |
2.67270 |
2.73150 |
2.84260 |
2.67270 |
2.73140 |
1 |
|
14.9707 |
14.4491 |
14.7614 |
14.9706 |
14.4490 |
14.7612 |
0.2 |
SCCC |
15.6274 |
15.0347 |
15.3964 |
15.6270 |
15.0343 |
15.3964 |
0.5 |
|
20.3359 |
19.7427 |
20.2216 |
20.3358 |
19.7427 |
2.22150 |
1 |
|
2.91680 |
2.83320 |
2.89300 |
2.91670 |
2.83310 |
2.89300 |
0.2 |
CFCC |
5.98950 |
5.81000 |
5.93590 |
5.98900 |
5.89910 |
5.93560 |
0.5 |
|
18.1564 |
17.7509 |
18.1155 |
18.1563 |
17.7508 |
18.1151 |
1 |
|
1.23070 |
1.19640 |
1.21090 |
1.22990 |
1.19590 |
1.21040 |
0.2 |
SFCS |
3.90480 |
3.75220 |
3.82210 |
3.90450 |
3.75200 |
3.82210 |
0.5 |
|
12.5125 |
12.2400 |
12.4766 |
12.5124 |
12.2398 |
12.4761 |
1 |
|
0.60808 |
0.59630 |
0.60450 |
0.60870 |
0.59610 |
0.60400 |
0.2 |
CSFF |
1.78730 |
1.73100 |
1.74190 |
1.78730 |
1.73000 |
1.74180 |
0.5 |
|
4.44620 |
4.35090 |
4.38030 |
4.44600 |
4.35090 |
4.37990 |
1 |
|
0.08840 |
0.08440 |
0.08780 |
0.08800 |
0.08430 |
0.08740 |
0.2 |
SFFF |
0.58860 |
0.55230 |
0.57920 |
0.58840 |
0.55210 |
0.57890 |
0.5 |
|
2.81410 |
2.04150 |
2.17190 |
2.81390 |
2.04140 |
2.17170 |
1 |
|
0.03810 |
0.03430 |
0.03750 |
0.03790 |
0.03400 |
0.03750 |
0.2 |
FFFF |
0.34860 |
0.32080 |
0.33190 |
0.34800 |
0.32070 |
0.33190 |
0.5 |
|
1.22530 |
1.17160 |
1.21460 |
1.22510 |
1.17150 |
1.21410 |
1 |
|
As the results show in Tables 2–4, the effect of the power-law index on dimensionless natural frequencies is very interesting. It is observed that increasing the power-law index value initially decreases, reaches a minimum, and then increases the frequency. This is because decreasing or increasing the dimensionless natural frequency depends on the kind of material researchers choose to study. For example, Matsunga [5] presented the free vibration and stability of FG plates according to a 2D, higher-order deformation theory in which the frequency parameter decreases with an increase in the power-law index. On the other hand, Thai and Choi [22] analyzed size-dependent, FG, Kirchhoff and Mindlin plate models based on a modified couple stress theory. Their results show that the frequency parameter decreases first and then rises. This phenomenon could be due to the fact that the frequency parameter of FG materials are dependent on both Young’s modulus (Young’s modulus plate rigidity) and density (density plate softening). In the presented material research, and similar to the results reported by Thai and Choi [22], with an increase in the power-law index, the dimensionless natural frequency decreases first and then rises because an increase in the power-law index in this research’s material caused Young’s modulus and density to decrease. A reduction in the Young’s modulus, consequently, caused the plates rigidity and frequency parameter to decrease. However, a decrease in the density leads to an increase in the frequency parameter. So, first, the effect of the Young’s modulus is greater than the effect of density on the frequency parameter; consequently, the dimensionless natural frequency first decreases. But after reaching a minimum, the effect of the density becomes greater than the effect of Young’s modulus, and it causes the dimensionless natural frequency to increase. By comparing the obtained dimensionless natural frequencies of the different boundary conditions that are shown in Tables 2–6, it was found that the dimensionless natural frequencies increase as the degrees of freedom of the plate decrease (increasing the geometric constraints on the edges of the plate). Because of the decreased degree of freedom at each edge of the rectangular plate, the plate gets stiffer, leading to increased dimensionless natural frequencies.
Tables 5 and 6 show the effect of the different boundary conditions and length-to-thickness ratios (a/h = 5, 8, 15, and 20) on the 3 first dimensionless natural frequencies ( ) of homogeneous, rectangular nano-/microplates using the exponential and trigonometric shear deformation plate theories. From the results in Tables 5 and 6, it can be found that, with an increase in the length-to-thickness ratio (constant length and thickness decreases), the dimensionless natural frequency increases. From these results, it can be seen that if the thickness increases, the effective stiffness and effective mass of the plate increase, but the growth of the effective stiffness is greater than the effective mass, so the natural frequency of the nano-/microplate increases.
As shown in Table 2, it can be found that the dimensionless natural frequency of nano-/microplates according to couple stress theory is greater than the dimensionless natural frequency of the plate, due to classical linearly elastic continuum mechanics ( ). This is because the potential energy of linearly elastic continuum mechanics is only defined by a function of the strain tensor in the classical exponential and trigonometric shear deformation plate theories.
Table 5. Comparison of the three first nondimensional natural frequency parameters for SSSS, SCSS, SCSC, SSSF, SFSF, SCSF, CCCC, SCCC, CFCC, SSCC, and SFCC, homogeneous, square nano-/microplates for different length-to-thickness ratios (g = 0, a/b = 1, ) |
|||||||
ESDT |
TSDT |
a/h |
B.C |
||||
Third mode |
Second mode |
First mode |
Third mode |
Second mode |
First mode |
||
19.0885 |
17.3734 |
7.51870 |
19.0881 |
17.3733 |
7.51870 |
5 |
SSSS |
27.7967 |
2404702 |
10.0574 |
27.7967 |
24.4701 |
10.0573 |
8 |
|
48.3788 |
41.5901 |
16.5255 |
48.3785 |
41.5901 |
16.5254 |
15 |
|
63.4543 |
54.2770 |
21.4145 |
63.4540 |
54.2730 |
21.4144 |
20 |
|
19.7053 |
19.0885 |
8.78180 |
19.7049 |
19.0883 |
8.78180 |
5 |
SCSS |
28.9468 |
28.6739 |
12.0817 |
28.9464 |
28.6735 |
12.0816 |
8 |
|
50.3357 |
49.9104 |
20.1517 |
50.3354 |
49.9971 |
20.1517 |
15 |
|
65.9542 |
65.4489 |
26.1877 |
65.9540 |
65.4489 |
26.1871 |
20 |
|
19.0952 |
19.0816 |
10.4078 |
19.0949 |
19.0814 |
10.4071 |
5 |
SCSC |
30.4398 |
30.0424 |
14.8677 |
30.4398 |
30.0424 |
14.8677 |
8 |
|
57.2944 |
53.0401 |
24.8475 |
57.2942 |
53.0401 |
24.8474 |
15 |
|
76.2987 |
68.8502 |
32.9207 |
76.2986 |
68.8501 |
32.9207 |
20 |
|
12.3624 |
12.1604 |
5.61230 |
12.3623 |
12.1597 |
5.61190 |
5 |
SSSF |
19.4566 |
17.8130 |
7.75900 |
19.4560 |
17.8060 |
7.75880 |
8 |
|
36.4812 |
30.6762 |
12.8755 |
36.4799 |
30.6762 |
12.8753 |
15 |
|
48.6416 |
401171 |
16.7025 |
48.6415 |
40.1169 |
16.7024 |
20 |
|
8.97430 |
7.07110 |
4.50870 |
8.97390 |
7.07060 |
4.50840 |
5 |
SFSF |
14.3589 |
9.86410 |
6.15520 |
14.3589 |
9.86400 |
6.15490 |
8 |
|
26.9229 |
16.5391 |
16.2031 |
26.9227 |
16.5390 |
16.2031 |
15 |
|
35.8972 |
21.4781 |
13.2281 |
35.8966 |
21.4775 |
13.2273 |
20 |
|
12.3628 |
12.1609 |
5.61270 |
12.3625 |
12.1599 |
5.61260 |
5 |
SCSF |
19.4569 |
17.8170 |
7.73590 |
19.4568 |
17.8168 |
7.73590 |
8 |
|
36.4815 |
30.6764 |
12.8759 |
36.4815 |
30.6763 |
12.8754 |
15 |
|
48.6419 |
40.1173 |
16.7029 |
48.6419 |
40.1171 |
16.7027 |
20 |
|
50.7356 |
36.5427 |
33.6441 |
50.7359 |
36.5426 |
33.6435 |
5 |
CCCC |
27.0417 |
19.6007 |
19.2698 |
27.0412 |
19.5999 |
19.2698 |
8 |
|
50.7359 |
36.5427 |
33.6441 |
50.7354 |
36.5425 |
33.6437 |
15 |
|
67.4061 |
48.5932 |
44.6753 |
67.4057 |
48.5931 |
44.6753 |
20 |
|
19.0906 |
19.0848 |
11.6717 |
19.0905 |
19.0884 |
11.6715 |
5 |
SCCC |
30.5488 |
30.5417 |
16.9560 |
30.5487 |
30.5411 |
16.9500 |
8 |
|
57.2544 |
57.1773 |
28.6683 |
57.2543 |
57.1772 |
28.6675 |
15 |
|
82.0035 |
76.3459 |
37.7139 |
82.0034 |
76.3458 |
37.7139 |
20 |
|
15.0734 |
12.1604 |
10.1567 |
15.0731 |
12.1604 |
10.1566 |
5 |
CFCC |
22.2911 |
19.4566 |
14.9637 |
22.2904 |
19.4554 |
14.9629 |
8 |
|
38.8576 |
36.4812 |
26.0918 |
38.8571 |
36.4809 |
26.0903 |
15 |
|
50.9237 |
48.6416 |
34.2048 |
50.9229 |
48.6405 |
34.2044 |
20 |
|
20.5762 |
19.0885 |
10.2617 |
20.5756 |
19.0878 |
10.2615 |
5 |
SSCC |
30.5416 |
30.1799 |
14.4481 |
30.5415 |
30.1797 |
14.1480 |
8 |
|
57.2654 |
52.4612 |
24.4775 |
57.2644 |
52.4607 |
24.4789 |
15 |
|
76.3539 |
68.7305 |
31.9135 |
76.3535 |
68.7304 |
31.9134 |
20 |
|
16.9181 |
12.1604 |
7.63680 |
16.9177 |
12.1697 |
7.63620 |
5 |
SFCC |
19.6768 |
19.4566 |
10.8800 |
19.6766 |
19.4565 |
10.8778 |
8 |
|
36.4812 |
34.0332 |
18.5534 |
36.4805 |
34.0324 |
18.5530 |
15 |
|
48.6416 |
44.5388 |
24.2071 |
48.6414 |
44.5387 |
24.2066 |
20 |
|
Table 6. Comparison of the three first nondimensional natural frequency parameter for SSCC, SFCC, FFCC, CFCS, SFCS, CSFF, CFCF, SSFF, CFSF, CFFF, SFFF, and FFFF, homogeneous, square nano-/microplates for different length-to-thickness ratios (g = 0, a/b = 1, ) |
|||||||
ESDT |
TSDT |
a/h |
B.C |
||||
Third mode |
Second mode |
First mode |
Third mode |
Second mode |
First mode |
||
20.5762 |
19.0885 |
10.2617 |
20.5756 |
19.0878 |
10.2615 |
5 |
SSCC |
30.5416 |
30.1799 |
14.4481 |
30.5415 |
30.1797 |
14.1480 |
8 |
|
57.2654 |
52.4612 |
24.4775 |
57.2644 |
52.4607 |
24.4789 |
15 |
|
76.3539 |
68.7305 |
31.9135 |
76.3535 |
68.7304 |
31.9134 |
20 |
|
16.9181 |
12.1604 |
7.63680 |
16.9177 |
12.1697 |
7.63620 |
5 |
SFCC |
19.6768 |
19.4566 |
10.8800 |
19.6766 |
19.4565 |
10.8778 |
8 |
|
36.4812 |
34.0332 |
18.5534 |
36.4805 |
34.0324 |
18.5530 |
15 |
|
48.6416 |
44.5388 |
24.2071 |
48.6414 |
44.5387 |
24.2066 |
20 |
|
10.1397 |
7.74920 |
3.09180 |
10.1395 |
7.74880 |
3.09160 |
5 |
FFCC |
13.6711 |
12.3987 |
4.38680 |
13.6710 |
12.3987 |
4.38650 |
8 |
|
23.2475 |
22.8323 |
7.59510 |
23.2474 |
22.8321 |
7.59480 |
15 |
|
30.9967 |
29.6265 |
9.96270 |
30.9967 |
29.6263 |
9.96240 |
20 |
|
16.9181 |
12.1604 |
9.92720 |
16.9177 |
12.1604 |
9.27710 |
5 |
CFCS |
20.0742 |
19.4566 |
14.6355 |
20.0741 |
19.4550 |
14.6350 |
8 |
|
36.4812 |
34.6875 |
25.5669 |
36.4810 |
34.6873 |
25.5664 |
15 |
|
48.6416 |
45.3792 |
33.5370 |
48.6414 |
45.3788 |
33.5368 |
20 |
|
16.9181 |
12.0543 |
7.33010 |
16.9175 |
12.0537 |
7.32940 |
5 |
SFCS |
19.4566 |
17.1289 |
10.4140 |
19.4562 |
17.1287 |
10.4110 |
8 |
|
36.2810 |
29.1811 |
17.7667 |
36.2807 |
29.1804 |
17.7661 |
15 |
|
48.6416 |
38.0750 |
23.1912 |
48.6409 |
38.0744 |
23.1911 |
20 |
|
10.1397 |
7.74920 |
2.51770 |
10.1395 |
7.74920 |
2.51760 |
5 |
CSFF |
12.3987 |
10.8310 |
3.60230 |
12.3984 |
10.8308 |
3.60220 |
8 |
|
23.2475 |
17.9114 |
6.29800 |
23.2474 |
17.9114 |
6.29700 |
15 |
|
30.9967 |
23.2027 |
8.28150 |
30.9965 |
23.2027 |
8.28140 |
20 |
|
16.5349 |
11.0593 |
8.97390 |
16.5346 |
11.0581 |
8.97350 |
5 |
CFCF |
16.3444 |
14.3596 |
14.3243 |
16.3444 |
14.3596 |
14.3237 |
8 |
|
28.4434 |
26.9226 |
26.0234 |
28.4434 |
26.9226 |
26.0234 |
15 |
|
37.2508 |
35.8962 |
32.7453 |
37.2508 |
35.8962 |
32.7453 |
20 |
|
8.1157 |
7.32850 |
1.60520 |
8.11560 |
7.32850 |
1.60500 |
5 |
SSFF |
11.7012 |
9.77340 |
2.27190 |
11.7010 |
9.77330 |
2.27180 |
8 |
|
20.2377 |
15.8028 |
3.91690 |
20.2374 |
15.8020 |
3.91660 |
15 |
|
26.4931 |
20.3743 |
5.12480 |
26.4930 |
20.3741 |
5.12450 |
20 |
|
15.5240 |
8.83300 |
6.83580 |
15.5240 |
8.83300 |
6.83580 |
5 |
CFSF |
14.3589 |
12.6404 |
9.76200 |
14.3587 |
12.6404 |
9.76190 |
8 |
|
26.9229 |
21.5324 |
16.7452 |
26.9226 |
21.5320 |
16.7449 |
15 |
|
38.8972 |
28.0669 |
21.8875 |
35.8968 |
28.0662 |
21.8871 |
20 |
|
7.96570 |
3.34000 |
1.65540 |
7.96540 |
3.33970 |
1.65510 |
5 |
CFFF |
5.71810 |
5.34400 |
2.28760 |
5.71790 |
5.34350 |
2.28730 |
8 |
|
10.0615 |
10.0199 |
3.88530 |
10.0614 |
10.0199 |
3.88520 |
15 |
|
13.3599 |
13.2335 |
5.07200 |
13.3599 |
13.2334 |
5.07170 |
20 |
|
3.54470 |
1.48690 |
0.76020 |
3.54460 |
1.48690 |
0.75970 |
5 |
SFFF |
3.16780 |
2.93870 |
1.27670 |
3.16750 |
2.93840 |
1.27650 |
8 |
|
5.57400 |
5.55500 |
2.15720 |
0.68850 |
0.53760 |
0.06170 |
15 |
|
7.41210 |
7.32740 |
5.07200 |
1.34340 |
0.56070 |
0.10610 |
20 |
|
1.44240 |
0.60490 |
0.45110 |
1.44230 |
0.60490 |
0.45090 |
5 |
FFFF |
1.28630 |
1.19490 |
0.51920 |
1.28640 |
1.19480 |
0.51910 |
8 |
|
2.26600 |
2.26020 |
0.87710 |
2.26100 |
2.27960 |
0.87680 |
15 |
|
4.39310 |
4.34430 |
2.06430 |
4.39290 |
4.34430 |
2.06410 |
20 |
|
The free vibration of size-dependent, rectangular, FG, nano-/microplates was analyzed based on nonlinear shear deformation plate theories using modified couple stress theory. The modified couple stress theory contains one material-length scale parameter, and it can also be degenerated to the classical FG, rectangular plate by setting the material-length scale parameter equal to zero. Equations of motion for free vibration can be found through an implementation of the Rayleigh-Ritz method, which may satisfy any combination of boundary conditions, including: SSSS, SCSS, SCSC, SSSF, SFSF, SCSF, CCCC, SSCC, SCCC, CFCF, SSFF, CFSF, CFFF, SFCS, CFCC, SFCC, FFCC, CFCS, CSFF, SFFF, and FFFF. Material properties were assumed to change continuously through the thickness according to a power-law distribution. A comparison of the present results with those reported in the literature for size-dependent, rectangular, FG nano-/microplates illustrated the high accuracy of the present study. This research shows the effects of variations of the length scale parameter, length-to-thickness ratio, power-law index, and the aspect ratio as well as different boundary conditions on the free vibration of a size-dependent, rectangular, FG nano-/microplate.
By looking into the present results, the following points may be concluded:
All analytical results presented here can be provided to other research groups of a reliable source to compare their analytical and numerical solutions.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding by Arak University, under Grant No. 95/8589.
References
[1] Yang FA, Chong AC, Lam DC, Tong P. Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity. Int J Solides Struct 2002; 39: 2731-2743.
[2] Eringen AC. Nonlocal polar elastic continua. Int J Eng Sci 1972; 10: 1-16.
[3] Nix WD, Gao H. Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 1998; 46: 411-425.
[4] Lu C, Wu D, Chen W, Non-linear responses of nano-scale FGM films including the effects of surface energies. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol 2011; 10(6); 1321–1327.
[5] Matsunaga H. Free vibration and stability of functionally graded plates according to a 2- graded plates according to a 2-D higher-order deformation theory. Compos Struct 2008; 82; 499-512.
[6] Salehipour H, Nahvi H, Shahidi AR. Exact closed-form free vibration analysis for functionally graded micro/nano plates based on modified couple stress and three-dimensional elasticity theories. Compos Struct 2015; 124: 283-291.
[7] Ansari R, Faghih-Shojaei M, Mohammadi V, Gholami R, Darabi MA. Nonlinear vibrations of functionally graded Mindlin microplates based on the modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 2014; 114: 124-134.
[8] Kim J, Reddy JN. Analytical solutions for bending, vibration, and buckling of FGM plates using a couple stress-based third-order theory. Compos Struct 2013; 103: 86-98.
[9] Thai H-T, Vo TP. A size-dependent functionally graded sinusoidal plate model based on a modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 2013; 96: 376-383.
[10] Shaat M, Mahmoud FF, Gao X-L, Faheem AF. Size-dependent bending analysis of Kirchhoff nano-plates based on a modified couple-stress theory including surface effects. Int J Mech Sci 2014; 79: 31-37.
[11] Lou J, He L. Closed-form solutions for nonlinear bending and free vibration of functionally graded microplates based on the modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 2015; 131: 810-820.
[12] He L, Lou J, Zhang E, Wang Y, Bai Y. A size-dependent four variable refined plate model for functionally graded microplates based on modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 2015; 130: 107-115.
[13] Zhang B, He Y, Liu D, Shen L, Lei J. An efficient size-dependent plate theory for bending, buckling and free vibration analyses of functionally graded microplates resting on elastic foundation. Appl Math Model 2015; 39(13): 3814-3845.
[14] Lou J, He L, Du J. A unified higher order plate theory for functionally graded microplates based on the modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 2015; 133: 1036-1047.
[15] Thai H-T, Kim S-E. A size-dependent functionally graded Reddy plate model based on a modified couple stress theory. Compos Part B: Eng 2013; 45(1): 1636-1645.
[16] Gupta A, Jain NK, Salhotra R, Joshi PV. Effect of microstructure on vibration characteristics of partially cracked rectangular plates based on a modified couple stress theory. Int J Mech Sci 2015; 100: 269-282.
[17] Li YS, Pan E. Static bending and free vibration of a functionally graded piezoelectric microplate based on the modified couple-stress theory, Int J Eng Sci 2015; 97: 40-59.
[18] Nguyen HX, Nguyen TN, Abdel-Wahab M, Bordas SPA, Nguyen-Xuan H, Vo TP. A refined quasi-3D isogeometric analysis for functionally graded microplates based on the modified couple stress theory. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2017; 313: 904-940.
[19] Lei J, He Y, Zhang B, Liu D, Shen L, Guo S. A size-dependent FG micro-plate model incorporating higher-order shear and normal deformation effects based on a modified couple stress theory. Int J Mech Sci 2015; 104: 8-23.
[20] Jandaghian AA, Rahmani O. Vibration analysis of functionally graded piezoelectric nanoscale plates by nonlocal elasticity theory: An analytical solution. Superlattices Microstructures 2016; 100: 57-75.
[21] Şimşeka M, Aydınc M. Size-dependent forced vibration of an imperfect functionally graded (FG) microplate with porosities subjected to a moving load using the modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 2017; 160: 408-421.
[22] Thai HT, Choi DH. Size-dependent functionally graded Kirchhoff and Mindlin plate models based on a modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 2013; 95; 142-153.
[23] Khorshidi K, Asgari T, Fallah A. Free vibrations analaysis of functionally graded rectangular na-noplates based on nonlocal exponential shear deformation theory. Mech Adv Compos Struct 2016; 2(2): 79-93.
[24] Khorshidi K, Fallah A. Buckling analysis of functionally graded rectangular nano-plate based on nonlocal exponential shear deformation theory. Int J Mech Sci 2016; 113: 94-104.
[25] Khorshidi K, Khodadadi M. Precision Closed-form Solution for Out-of-plane Vibration of Rectangular Plates via Trigonometric Shear Deformation Theory. Mech Adv Compos Struct 2016; 3(1): 31-43.
[26] Reddy JN, Kim J. A nonlinear modified couple stress-based third-order theory of functionally graded plates. Compos Struct 2012; 94(3);1128-1143.
[27] Simsek M, Reddy JN. Bending and vibration of functionally graded microbeams using a new higher order beam theory and the modified couple stress theory. Int J Eng Sci 2013; 64; 37–53.
[28] Jung WY, Han SCH, Park WT. A modified couple stress theory for buckling analysis of S-FGM nanoplates embedded in Pasternak elastic medium. Compos Part B 2014; 60; 746–56.
[29] Jung WY, Park WT, Han SCH. Bending and vibration analysis of S-FGM microplates embedded in Pasternak elastic medium using the modified couple stress theory. Int J Mech Sci 2014; 87;150–62.
[30] Ramu I, Mohanty SC. Study on free vibration analysis of rectangular plate structures using finite element method. Procedia Eng 2012; 31(38):2758-66.
[31] Gospodinov G, Ljutskanov D. The boundary element method applied to plates. Appl Math Model 1982; 6(4); 237-244.
[32] Chang, AT. An improved finite difference method for plate vibration. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1972; 5(2); 289-296.
[33] Liew K M, Liu FL. Differential quadrature method for vibration analysis of shear deformable annular sector plates. J Sound Vib 2000; 230(2); 335-356.
[34] Chu F, Wang L, Zhong Z, He J. Hermite radial basis collocation method for vibration of functionally graded plates with in-plane material inhomogeneity. Comput Struct 2014; 142; 79-89.
[35] Saadatpour MM, Azhari M. The Galerkin method for static analysis of simply supported plates of general shape. Comput Struct 1998; 69(1); 1-9.
[36] Reddy JN. Nonlocal theories for bending, buckling and vibration of beams. Int J Eng Sci 2007; 45(2); 288-307.
[37] Khorshidi K. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on vibrating rectangular plates coupled with fluid. Sci Iranica. Trans A: Civil Eng 2010; 17(6): 415–29.
[38] Hosseini-Hashemi Sh, Khorshidi K, Payandeh H. Vibration analysis of moderately thick rectangular plates with internal line support using the Rayleigh-Ritz approach. Sci Iranica. Trans B: Mech Eng 2009; 16(1): 22-39,
[39] Khorshidi K, Bakhsheshy A. Free Natural Frequency Analysis of an FG Composite Rectangular Plate Coupled with Fluid using Rayleigh–Ritz Method. Mech Adv Compos Struct 2014; 1(2): 131-143.