Free Vibration Response of Agglomerated Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Nanocomposite Plates

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur-273010, India

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee-247667, India

Abstract

The current investigation deals with the effect of carbon nanotube (CNT) agglomeration on the free vibration behavior of nanocomposite plates created by inserting various graded distributions of carbon nanotube (CNT) in a polymeric matrix. In this study, affected material properties because of the CNT agglomeration effect were estimated first according to the two-parameter agglomeration model based on the Eshelby-Mori-Tanaka approach for randomly oriented carbon nanotubes, and then a FEM code has been developed to model the FG plate using third-order shear deformation theory. In the used higher-order shear deformation theory, transverse shear stresses are represented by quadratic variation along the thickness direction, resulting in no need for a shear correction factor. Next, the present approach is implemented with the FEM by employing a C0 continuous isoparametric Lagrangian FE model with seven nodal unknowns per node. Finally, the effect of various levels of agglomeration by altering the agglomeration parameters, different CNT distribution patterns across the thickness direction, and various side-to-thickness ratios along with various boundary conditions on the free vibration response of CNT reinforced composite plates explored parametrically. The generated result shows that the CNT agglomeration effect has a significant impact on the natural frequencies of the nanocomposite plate.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Free Vibration Response of Agglomerated Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Nanocomposite Plates

  1. C. Maurya a* , S. M. A. Jawaid a , A. Chakrabarti b

a Department of Civil Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur-273010, India

b Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee-247667, India

 

KEYWORDS

 

ABSTRACT

FE method;

HSDT;

Eshelby-Mori-Tanaka;

Carbon nanotubes;

Frequency.

The current investigation deals with the effect of carbon nanotube (CNT) agglomeration on the free vibration behavior of nanocomposite plates created by inserting various graded distributions of carbon nanotube (CNT) in a polymeric matrix. In this study, affected material properties because of the CNT agglomeration effect were estimated first according to the two-parameter agglomeration model based on the Eshelby-Mori-Tanaka approach for randomly oriented carbon nanotubes, and then a FEM code has been developed to model the FG plate using third-order shear deformation theory. In the used higher-order shear deformation theory, transverse shear stresses are represented by quadratic variation along the thickness direction, resulting in no need for a shear correction factor. Next, the present approach is implemented with the FEM by employing a C0 continuous isoparametric Lagrangian FE model with seven nodal unknowns per node. Finally, the effect of various levels of agglomeration by altering the agglomeration parameters, different CNT distribution patterns across the thickness direction, and various side-to-thickness ratios along with various boundary conditions on the free vibration response of CNT reinforced composite plates explored parametrically. The generated result shows that the CNT agglomeration effect has a significant impact on the natural frequencies of the nanocomposite plate.

 

 

1.     Introduction

The work of Iijima [1,2] enabled scientists to comprehend the enormous potential of Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) and piqued the curiosity of many researchers who set out to find a practical use for CNTs that would benefit from them. Because of their superior mechanical and thermal qualities, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been recognized as the ideal candidate for reinforcing composite materials that may be used in a wide range of technological disciplines, including aerospace and mechanical engineering, since their discovery [3]. Functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composites (FG-CNTRCs) have received a lot of interest in recent years due to their exceptional mechanical properties. FG-CNTRC structures have numerous potential applications in aerospace, civil and ocean engineering, the automotive industry, and smart structures [41]. Nonetheless, as seen by many publications published on the subject, the characterization of the mechanical properties of CNTs is still an unresolved question [4]. Several ways to define the mechanical behavior of such composites can be discovered in the literature. They are commonly used for various structural purposes to improve the dynamic response or to provide a superior attitude in particular buckling issues. As a result of these considerations, it was decided to investigate the effect of CNT insertion into the polymeric matrix with various distributions and the agglomeration effect.

The simplified method for determining Young’s moduli, shear moduli, and Poisson's ratios of a CNT-reinforced layer with orthotropic properties is to use an extended version of the Rule of Mixture, which can be found in [5]. The studies of Alibeigloo and Liew [6] and Alibeigloo [7], in which the elasticity is applied to explore the thermal and dynamic behavior of various CNT-reinforced composite structures, respectively, provide some examples of this approach in use. The books of Alibeigloo and Liew [6] and Alibeigloo [7] contain examples of these uses.

In their most recent publications [8,9], Zhang, Lei, and Liew characterize the engineering constants of the material using the same micromechanical method to assess the mechanical properties of these composites. In these studies, the free vibration analysis is numerically solved using an upgraded version of the conventional Ritz approach.

Shi et. al. [10] suggest a strategy that is entirely distinct from any other one that has been used before to explore the CNTs agglomeration effect using a two-parameter theoretical model. The foundation of this concept is based on the idea that the spatial distribution of CNTs inside the matrix is not uniform, and as a consequence, certain regions of the composite material have a larger reinforcing particle concentration than others. After that, an evaluation of the effective mechanical characteristics of the composite, which in this instance possesses isotropic overall features, is carried out using a homogenization method that is based on the popular Mori-Tanaka method for granular composite materials [11]. The works [4,12], which present some parametric investigations to look into the impact that CNT agglomeration has on the vibrational behavior of various basic structures, take into account the current strategy. The purpose of these studies is to determine whether or not CNT agglomeration is beneficial.

Hedayati and Sobhani Aragh have especially considered the impact of graded agglomerated CNTs on annular sectorial plates' free vibration behavior sitting on the Pasternak foundation [12]. On the other hand, Sobhani Aragh et al. have evaluated the natural frequencies of CNT- reinforced cylindrical shells [4,13]. In the research that was carried out and presented by Giovanni et. al. [14], the composite plates were assumed to be made of a purely isotropic elastic hosting matrix of one of three distinct types (epoxy, rubber, or concrete) and embedded single-walled carbon nanotubes. The computations are done by discretizing the composite plates as finite elements using the finite element method (FE). It is determined how the modal characteristics are changed both locally and globally by the impacts of the CNT alignment and volume percentage, and it is then demonstrated that the lowest natural frequencies of CNT-reinforced rubber composites can rise by up to 500 %.  To generate and precisely solve the equations of motion, the analysis technique is based on the FSDT [15]. This is accomplished in order to record the fundamental frequencies of the rectangular functionally graded (FG) plates that are supported by an elastic base. Through the use of the finite element method, the purpose of this study is to ascertain the natural frequencies of an isotropic thin plate. The frequencies that were calculated have been contrasted with those that were determined using an exact Levy-type solution. The Kirchhoff plate theory is used as the foundation for the calculation of the stiffness and mass matrices, which are done using the finite element method (FEM). The natural frequencies of the considered rectangular plate can be obtained with the help of this methodology, which is useful [16]. The impact of CNT agglomeration on the elastic characteristics of nanocomposites is assessed using a two-parameter micromechanics model of agglomeration. In this research, an analogous continuum model based on the Eshelby-Mori-Tanaka method is used to determine the effective constitutive law of an elastic isotropic medium (matrix) with oriented straight CNTs. The results of this research work are presented in this article. The discretization of the equations of motion and the implementation of the various boundary conditions are both accomplished through the use of the generalized differential quadrature method (GDQM) for two dimensions [12]. With four unknowns, a new higher-order shear deformation theory has been devised, but it takes into consideration the transverse shear strains' parabolic fluctuation across the plate thickness. The flexure and free vibration analysis of FG plates is done using this theory. Therefore, a shear correction factor is not required to be used. The findings indicate that the present theory is capable of achieving the same level of precision as the existing higher-order theories of shear deformation, despite the latter's greater number of unanswered questions; however, the present theory's precision cannot be compared to that of 3D and quasi-3D models that take into account the effect of thickness stretching [17]. Zhang et. al. [9] used both the element-free IMLS-Ritz technique and first-order shear deformation theory, also known as FSDT, to account for the impact of the plate’s transverse shear deformation. The study investigated how the vibration behavior of the plate was affected by various factors, including the volume fraction of carbon nanotubes, the plate's thickness-to-width ratio, the plate's aspect ratio, and the boundary condition. Mareishi et. al. [5] studied the nonlinear free and forced vibration behavior of advanced nano-composite beams resting on nonlinear elastic foundations. SWCNT volume fractions and dispersion patterns affect system behavior. Researchers studied the nonlinear forced and free vibration response of smart laminated nano-composite beams and discovered this. Tornabene et. al. [18] looked at how agglomerated CNT affected the free vibration behavior of laminated composite plates and double-curved shells. They used Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF), which is a method that permits the consideration of multiple Higher-order Shear Deformations Theories (HSDTs). Kiani [19] looked at how CNT-based nano-composite plates that had layers of piezoelectric material on the top and bottom behaved when they were free to move. During the course of the research, the properties of the composite medium were determined with reference to a revised version of the rule of mixtures method that incorporates efficiency parameters. The electric potential was thought to be spread out in a straight line across the thickness of the piezoelectric material. The full set of motion and Maxwell equations for the system were found by using the Ritz formulation, which works for any in-plane and out-of-plane boundary conditions. These equations describe the system's behavior. In this case, the researcher takes into consideration both open circuits and closed circuits as potential electrical boundary conditions for the free surfaces of the piezoelectric layers. According to the findings of the study, the resultant eigenvalue system was successfully solved in order to get the system's frequencies as well as the mode shapes. In the end, it was determined that the fundamental frequency of a plate with a closed circuit always had a higher value than the fundamental frequency of a plate with open circuit boundary conditions. A new eight-unknown shear deformation theory was developed by Nguyen et. al. [20] for the bending and free vibration study of FG plates using the finite-element method. The presented theory concurrently fulfills zeros for the transverse strains at the top and bottom surfaces of FG plates and is based on a full 12-unknown higher-order shear deformation theory. The research utilized a rectangular element with four nodes and sixteen degrees of freedom at each node. In the end, the results were checked against the results that were already published in the relevant literature. Over the course of the research, parametric studies were carried out for a variety of power-law indices and side-to-thickness ratios. Using both experimental measurements and an analytical method, Moghadam et. al. [21] investigated the effect of CNT agglomerates on the residual stresses in a fiber-reinforced nanocomposite. In order to calculate the residual stress that was caused by thermal treatment, an analytical solution was utilized, which was founded on the traditional laminate theory. The observed residual stresses acquired using the incremental hole-drilling method were found to be in good agreement with the theoretical residual stresses computed by each layer of the laminates. The study's findings demonstrated that poorly dispersed samples produced higher residual stresses when compared to perfectly dispersed samples, and this phenomenon was found to be more significant in the case of nanocomposites containing higher weight fractions of CNTs. Hamid et al. [22] studied the free vibration of size-dependent CNTRC nanoplates on a visco-Pasternak foundation. Maleki et al. [23] solved the free vibration problem of three-phase carbon fiber/nanotube/polymer nanocomposite conical shells using the GDQM. This was done in order to address the impact that the agglomeration of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) has on the dynamic responses of the shell. The final finding of the study was that the presence of agglomeration phenomena can significantly alter the dynamic behavior of the nanocomposite structure. Zhang et al. [34,35] studied the vibration analysis of carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforced functionally graded composite triangular plates subjected to in-plane stresses and also investigated the effect of in-plane forces on the vibration behavior of carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforced composite skew plates using first-order shear deformation theory. Zhang and Salem [36] investigated the free vibration behavior of carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforced functionally graded thick laminated composite plates utilizing Reddy’s higher-order shear deformation theory (HSDT) in combination with element-free IMLS-Ritz method with four types of CNT distributions. Finally, the influence of boundary conditions on the sequence of the first six mode shapes for various lamination arrangements is studied in detail. Mehar and Panda [37] studied in detail the vibration characteristics of carbon-nanotube-reinforced sandwich curved shell panels under the elevated thermal environment using the higher-order shear deformation theory. Mehar et. al. [38-40] have done extensive theoretical and experimental investigations of vibration characteristics of carbon-nanotube reinforced polymer composite structures.

In conclusion, from the above-detailed literature review, the current manuscript is structured in a manner that helps to incorporate the CNTs agglomeration effect as can be seen that CNTs tend to agglomerate for low-volume fraction distribution. Hence, if the above-mentioned effect is not considered, will lead to erroneous results for the structures built from these CNT materials. The current work focuses on the analysis of functionally graded CNT reinforced plates, including the effect of agglomeration with different CNT distribution patterns, aspect ratio, and boundary conditions regarding its influence on the natural frequency of plate structure only. The analysis is based on the finite element method using Reddy’s HSDT model. The material properties of agglomerated CNTs are evaluated based on the Eshelby-Mori-Tanaka method.

2.     Material Modelling

For any structural analysis, material modeling is very important. The application of CNT-reinforced composite structures, demands to development of detailed modeling of the effective material properties of a such composite at the macroscopic level. Because molecular dynamics or other atomistic models are computationally intensive, micromechanical methods are used to describe the behavior of these materials in this work.

Material modeling of FG-CNTRC is presented using the Mori-Tanaka method, considering the effect of agglomeration of CNT for various types of CNT distributions.

2.1. Material Modeling of FG-CNTRC

The FG-CNTRC material is considered to be made up of an isotropic matrix (e.g., epoxy resin) and fiber (CNTs), with material qualities graded along the direction of thickness of the plate as per linear distribution (UD and FG-V) of the fraction of volume of CNTs (fig.1).

The volume fractions (Vcnt) of CNTs in four types of functionally graded carbon nanotube plates are stated as follows:

 

(1)

 

(2)

where,  represents the CNTs mass fraction and  and  the densities of carbon nanotube and matrix, respectively. The material properties can be determined for this linear material property fluctuation by putting the value of into Eq. (1) for linear material property variation.

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

(d)

Fig. 1. (a) Uniformly distributed CNT nanocomposite plate, (b) V-Shape distributed CNT nanocomposite plate, (c) X-Shape distributed CNT nanocomposite plate, (d) O-Shape distributed CNT nanocomposite plate.

2.2. Modeling of Nanocomposite Material:

Several micromechanical models have been proposed to predict the properties of the material of CNT-reinforced composites. In this research, the Mori–Tanaka technique is used to estimate the elastic properties of the equivalent fiber/polymer material. The equivalent inclusion average stress technique, commonly known as the Eshelby–Mori–Tanaka method, is based on Eshelby's [8] equivalent elastic inclusion notion and Mori-Tanaka’s [6] concept of average stress inside the matrix. Benveniste’s [9] revision of the effective modulus of elasticity tensor C of CNT-reinforced composites is as follows:

 

(3)

The symbol I is denoted as a fourth-order unit tensor. The matrix stiffness tensors are Cm, while the equivalent fiber stiffness tensors are Cr (CNT). The angle brackets in their overall configuration represent an average of all possible orientations for the inclusions. Ar is the tensor of the concentration of dilute mechanical strain, and it can be calculated as follows:

 

 

(4)

here symbol S represents the Eshelby tensor of the fourth order, as defined by Mura and Eshelby [8,10].

Here, a single-walled carbon nanotube having a solid cylinder of 1.424 nm diameter with (10,10) chirality index [11] is used for the analysis.

2.2.1.        Randomly Oriented CNT-Reinforced Composites:

Two Euler angles show straight carbon nanotube orientation α and β, denoted by the arrows in Fig. 2. As a result, the base vectors of the global  coordinate system and the base vectors of  the local coordinate system are produced, which are related through the transformation matrix g, as follows:

 

(5)

where g is given as:

 

(6)

It is possible to characterize the orientation distribution of carbon nanotubes in composites by a function of probability density p(α, β) that meets the normalizing condition.

 

(7)

Considering the random CNT orientation, the function of density for this case is,

 

(8)

Calculation of Hill's elastic moduli for the reinforcing phase was accomplished by analyzing the equivalence of the two matrices that are presented below [13]:

 

    

(9)

the terms kr, lr, mr, nr, and pr in Eq. (9) represent Hill’s elastic moduli for the reinforcing phase (CNTs) of the composite calculated by the inverse of the compliance matrix of the equivalent fiber.

 

Fig. 2. Representative volume element (RVE) Composed of Randomly oriented straight CNT [12].

As for the composite's properties EL, ET, EZ, GLT, GTZ, GTZ, and νLT, which may be established using the rule of mixture technique, the first step is to determine the properties of the composite by performing a multiscale finite element analysis or molecular dynamics simulation analysis [14] on the composite.

Here, the composite is considered to be isotropic when the carbon nanotubes are orientated totally randomly in nature in the matrix. For this, the bulk modulus K and shear modulus G is calculated as follows:

 

(10)

 

(11)

The term Km and Gm are used for bulk and shear moduli of the matrix, respectively.

 

(12)

 

(13)

 

(14)

 

(15)

     

Finally, the modulus of elasticity and Poison ratio of a CNT-based nanocomposite material are as follows:

 

(16)

 

(17)

Additionally, Vcnt and Vm represent the volume fractions of the carbon nanotubes and matrix, respectively, which fulfill the expression
Vcnt + Vm = 1. In a similar way, the mass density ρ is determined as follows:

 

(18)

where  and represents the mass density of matrix and carbon nanotubes, respectively.

2.2.2.        Agglomeration of Carbon Nanotubes

A large proportion of carbon nanotubes in carbon nanotube-reinforced composites has been found to be concentrated in agglomerates. Nanotubes agglomerate into bundles due to the van der Waals attractive interactions between them. After determining the material properties of FG-CNTRC without taking into account the CNT agglomeration effect, a new micromechanics model is developed and applied to a random oriented, agglomerated CNT-reinforced polymer composite to determine the effective properties of the material of a single-walled CNT reinforced polymer composite while taking into account the CNTs bundling effect. The influence of agglomeration on the elastic characteristics of CNT-reinforced composites having random orientation is investigated in the present study, which uses a two-parameter micromechanics agglomeration model to do this.

As per Fig. 3, it can be seen that the elastic characteristics of the surrounding material are distinct from the areas where inclusions have concentrated nanotubes.

  • Two Parameter Agglomeration Model

In polymer matrix, the major cause of agglomeration of carbon nanotubes is the small diameter, due to which the elastic modulus gets reduced and the aspect ratio increases in the radial direction and hence producing low bending strength. It is crucial that carbon nanotubes are dispersed uniformly inside the matrix to achieve the desired features of CNT-reinforced composites. Here, a micromechanical model has been built to check the CNTs agglomeration effect on the effectiveness of carbon nanotube-enhanced elastic modules.

Shi et al. [5] found that a substantial number of CNTs are concentrated in aggregates in the 7.5 % concentration sample. Carbon nanotubes are found to be unevenly distributed in the substrate, with a few areas having CNT concentrations larger than the average volume fraction. As illustrated in Fig. 3, these areas containing concentrated carbon nanotubes are considered spherical in this section and are referred to as 'inclusions' having a mix of varying elasticity characteristics from the surrounding material.

 

Fig. 3. Agglomeration of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) within the representative volume element (RVE)

The total volume Vr of CNTs in the RVE may be separated into two parts:

 

(19)

where  and are represented as the CNTs' volume dispersed in the matrix and the inclusions (concentrated regions), respectively.

To understand clearly the effect of carbon nanotube agglomeration, two parameters are introduced as ξ & ζ.

 

(20)

where  represents the volume of the RVE's sphere inclusions. In this case,  represents the volume of the inclusion fraction in relation to the RVE's total volume V.  Whenever  is equal to one, CNTs are assumed to be distributed uniformly in the matrix, and as the value of  decreases, the degree of agglomeration of carbon nanotubes becomes more severe (Fig. 5). The symbol  denotes the nanotubes volume ratio distributed in the inclusions to the total volume of the CNTs. When the value  is 1, all of the nanotubes are concentrated in the sphere regions. This is true if all nanotubes are dispersed evenly (i.e.,    =  ) throughout the matrix. As the value of increases (i.e., ), the CNT’s spatial distribution becomes more. Vcnt denotes the average carbon nanotube volume fraction in the composite as per Eq. (21).

 

(21)

The carbon nanotube volume fractions in the inclusions and the matrix are calculated using Eqs. (19)-(21), and they are expressed as

 

(22)

 

(23)

 

Fig. 4.  (Without agglomeration)

 

Fig. 5.  (Complete agglomeration)

 

Fig. 6.  (Partial agglomeration)

As a result, the Composite reinforced with carbon nanotubes is viewed as a system made up of sphere-shaped inclusions embedded in a hybrid matrix. CNTs can be found in both the matrix as well as in the inclusions also. Hence to compute the composite system's overall property, first, we have to estimate the inclusion’s effective elastic stiffness and then the matrix.

 Different micromechanics methods can be used to calculate the effective modulus of elasticity of the hybrid inclusions and matrix. Assuming that all CNT orientations are completely random and the nanotubes are transversely isotropic, the Mori-Tanaka scheme is used to estimate the hybrid matrix's elastic moduli, as described in the previous section. The carbon nanotubes are assumed to be oriented randomly within the inclusions, and thus the inclusions are isotropic. The term Kin and Kout represent the effective bulk moduli Gin and Gout represents the effective shear moduli of the inclusions and matrix, respectively given as:

 

(24)

 

(25)

 

(26)

 

(27)

Following that, the composite's effective bulk modulus K and effective shear modulus G are computed using the method of Mori-Tanaka as follows:

 

(28)

 

(29)

where,

 

(30)

Finally, the CNT-reinforced composite’s young modulus is calculated using Eq. (16).

3.     Formulation

3.1. In-Plane Displacement Fields and Strains

The FGM plate's geometry used in this analysis is shown in Fig. 7. The plate's length and width are denoted by a and b, respectively, and its thickness is represented by h. The center of the FGCNT plate serves as the origin for material coordinates (x, y, and z). Plates are simply supported along their four edges, for the square plate. The aspect ratio considered is h/a = 0.1.

The in-plane displacement variation of u, v, and displacement in transverse direction w across the plate thickness may be described as using Reddy's theory of higher-order shear deformation [15].

 

(31)

where ,  and  signify the displacement of a point along the (x, y, z) coordinates located at mid-plane, respectively.  and  denotes the bending rotations in the y and x directions, respectively, and ,  denotes the shear rotations assumed in the x, and y directions.

The relationship between the strain component and the strain displacement is defined as follows:

(32)

The overall strain may be represented as mechanical strains for the purposes of plate analysis.

 

(33)

where  represents the mechanical strain.

Again, in terms of total strain, the mechanical strain may be represented as

 

(34)

while  is the thickness coordinates-z function, and  is the function of x and y.

 

Fig. 7. Geometry of the FGCNT Plate

This describes the overall strain as,

 

(35)

3.2. Constitutive Relationship

The relation between stress and strain for FGM is as follows:

 

(36)

where constitutive matrix

 

(37)

In Eq. (37) the terms Qij are derived from the FG material properties, depending on the plate’s thickness (z) as shown below in Eq. (38).

 

(38)

3.3. Virtual work in FGCNT plate

The FGM plate’s virtual work may be represented as

 

(39)

With the help of Eq. (36), Eq. (39) can be rewritten as

 

(40)

The following equation can be extended further using Eq. (35) as follows:

 

(41)

In Eq. (41) the matrix [Q] represents the constitutive matrix with elasticity derived from the constituent’s elastic properties as given in Eq. (37). While [H] represents the 5 x 15 order matrix and includes the terms z and h as described below:

(42)

Finally, we can rewrite Eq. (41) as

 

(43)

where matrix [D] represents the rigidity matrix vector. For which the corresponding expression is given in Eq. (44) shown below.

 

(44)

4.     Finite Element Formulation

4.1. Element Description

Figure 8 illustrates the isoparametric Lagrangian element’s geometry with nine nodes used in the analysis. In this element, there is a total of sixty-three degrees of freedom because each node has seven degrees of freedom (u, v, w, , , and ). In the x-y plane coordinate system, this element has a rectangular geometry that is completely arbitrary. The element is transferred to  plane in order to get a rectangular geometry.

 

Fig. 8. Nine-noded Iso-parametric element with node numbering

For the present nine-node element the shape functions used are given below,

 

(45)

The relationship between strain and displacement can be established using the nine shape functions mentioned above. The vector of a strain can be expressed in the following way:

 

(46)

In Eq. (46) matrix [B] represents the strain-displacement matrix and matrix [X] represents the vector of nodal displacement for the element chosen and both matrices can be represented as follows:

,

 

(47)

4.2. Governing Equation for The Analysis of Free Vibrations

Mid-surface displacement parameters (uo, vo and wo) can be used to calculate acceleration at any location within the element, as

 

(48)

In the above Eq. (48) the vector  represents the nodal unknowns which is of order 7 x 1 and contains the terms of Eq. (33).

Again, the matrix  is decoupled into matrix [C] which contains the shape functions (Ni) and global displacement vector .

 

(49)

The mass matrix of an element can be expressed using Eq. (48) and (49),

 

(50)

where the matrix [L] expression can be represented as

 

(51)

while ρ is the estimated density of the composite material from Eq. (18). As a result, the governing equation for free vibration analysis is,

 

(52)

5.     Numerical Results & Discussion

In this section, many numerical examples were studied for the free vibration behavior of functionally graded nanocomposite plates with different distributions of carbon nanotube (Fig. 1) has been done by considering various agglomeration stages as shown in Figs. 4-6. This section is separated into two distinct sections. The first phase involves a convergence study and validation of the current formulation for isotropic plates [16] with varying aspect ratios, as no solution exists for the current problem. After confirming the effectiveness of the current formulation, the second step investigates the impacts of various agglomeration stages on the nondimensional frequency of the plate. In all the above phases, the influence of different boundary conditions (SSSS, CCCC, SCSC & SFSF) with different CNT distributions are investigated considering three stages of agglomeration (Fig.4) as (without agglomeration case), (complete agglomeration case) and (partial agglomeration case) are investigated. The properties of SWCNT (10,10) are listed in Table 1. The matrix substance employed in this situation has the following elastic characteristics: Em = 2.1 GPa,
υm = 0.34, ρm = 1150 kg/m3, and Table 1 lists the material characteristics of the reinforcement. The UD, FG-V, FG-X, and FG-O type reinforcement distributions with various levels of agglomeration testing were taken into consideration. 7.5% of the value is taken into consideration, which is a significant number of carbon nanotubes [30].

Here, before the verification and convergence study the mechanical properties were verified with the experimental work done by Odegard et al. [33] and presented in Fig. 9. From Fig. 9 it can be observed that the Eshelby-Mori-Tanaka scheme proposed by Shi et. al. [10] for the estimation of material properties and the results generated by Odegard et al. [33] are very close for the prediction of mechanical properties.

The result produced by the EMT approach for the agglomeration parameter ξ= 0.4 corresponding to ζ=1 (resembles the complete agglomeration behavior) is plotted in Fig. 9 with good agreement. The material for the matrix is used as Em = 0.85 GPa and υm = 0.3, combined with the CNT properties given in Table 1 using the EMT approach to calculate overall mechanical properties for the analysis.  The results generated here show, at the value of parameter ξ= 1 Young’s modulus has the higher increase in function of volume fraction, and as the value of ξ decreases, the increase in the CNT volume fraction does not correspond to the expected increase of mechanical properties because of the severity of the agglomeration effect.

Fig. 9 itself is self-explanatory, and at the highest values of Young’s modulus, both agglomeration parameters are considered equal values. It is also possible to observe that the variation of the parameter of ξ has a higher impact on mechanical properties as compared to other parameters ζ. After a thorough study of the effect of two agglomeration parameters (ζ,ξ) on overall elastic properties, three different stages of agglomeration are generated in the next section to understand the free vibration behavior of square plate with four types of CNT distribution patterns along the thickness direction as shown in Figs. 4-6.

Fig. 9. Young’s modulus for different levels of agglomeration and CNT volume fraction

 

Table 1. Hill’s elastic moduli for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNT) [31].

Carbon nanotubes

 

 

 

 

 

SWCNT (10,10)

271

88

17

1089

442

Table 2. First six natural frequencies in Hz for isotropic plate (L = 0.6 m, B = 0.4 m) [16].

 

Plate thickness

h = 0.00625

Plate thickness

h = 0.0125

Plate thickness

h = 0.025

Plate thickness

h = 0.05

Mode No.

Ref.[16]

Present

Ref.[16]

Present

Ref.[16]

Present

Ref.[16]

Present

1

136.5

136.60

273.1

272.48

546.2

540.74

1092.5

1050.91

2

262.6

263.35

525.2

523.17

1050.4

1030.71

2100.9

1957.18

3

420.1

419.76

840.3

834.01

1680.7

1630.81

3361.5

3359.37

4

472.7

474.51

945.4

938.67

1890.8

1828.95

3781.7

3822.49

5

546.2

547.49

1092.5

1082.78

2185.0

2102.56

4370.1

4443.28

6

756.35

761.65

1512.7

1495.83

3025.4

3031.09

6050.8

6072.08

 

 

5.1. Validation Study-Isotropic Plate Under Free Vibration Case

A convergence study was carried out for free vibration analyses of agglomerated CNT-reinforced functionally graded plates in order to determine the appropriate number of mesh sizes that should be used in order to achieve accurate results.

The convergence analysis for a simply supported FG-CNT-reinforced plate at the fundamental frequency is shown in Table 2. The results are computed for = 0.075 and a/h = 10 for different mesh sizes. Based on the results of these convergence studies, it has been determined that a mesh size of 16 x 16 is suitable for free vibration analysis of FG-CNT-reinforced plates. The outcomes of the free vibration analyses for an isotropic square plate are presented in Table 1 (E = 70 GPa, ρ = 2700 kg/m3, and υ = 0.3). A comparison was made between the dimensionless frequency parameter of the isotropic plate and the HSDT results for a moderately thick plate [37].

5.2.  Validation Study- FGM Plate Under Free Vibration Effect

A simply supported FGM plate consisting of aluminum (ceramic) and zirconium oxide (metal) is considered in the present problem. The properties of the constituents are: Ec = 151 GPa; Em = 70 GPa; ϒc = ϒm = 0.3; ρc = 3000 kg/m3;
ρm = 2707 kg/m3.The non-dimensional natural frequency parameter used in the present study is .

In Table 3, the natural frequency obtained from the present study is compared with the results of Talha et. al. [32], which are also based on higher-order shear deformation theory. The thickness ratio (a/h) is taken as 20 and the volume fraction index (n) is varied from 0.5 to 10.

Table 3. Variation of the frequency parameter with the volume fraction index, n, for SSSS square (Al/ZrO2)
FGM plates (a/h = 20)

Mode

n = 1

n = 5

Ref. [32]

Present

Ref. [32]

Present

1

1.734

1.668

1.621

1.568

2

4.332

4.116

4.046

3.865

3

4.332

4.116

4.046

3.865

4

6.869

6.506

6.405

6.100

5

8.902

8.067

8.269

7.556

5.3. New Results for the Effect of The Agglomeration on FG-CNTRs Square Plates Free Vibrations Behavior

The free vibration behavior of a square plate, as shown in Fig. 1, was evaluated in the following subsections using the element Q9 with 16 x 16 elements (Table 4). In this section, various aspect ratio variations such as 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 are taken for the purpose of analysis, along with a variety of boundary conditions. A complete parametric study is also done to find out more about the three-agglomeration stage. Different levels of agglomeration were tested on UD, FG-V, FG-X and FG-O type of carbon nanotube distribution.

Table 4. Convergence study for the dimensional frequency of an agglomerated CNT-reinforced plate with simply supported boundary conditions.

Mesh Size

UD

FG-V

FG-X

FG-O

8 x 8

15.823

13.822

18.800

12.157

10 x 10

15.819

13.817

18.796

12.153

12 x 12

15.817

13.815

18.795

12.151

14 x 14

15.817

13.814

18.794

12.150

16 x 16

15.816

13.814

18.794

12.150

The dimensionless frequencies used in this study were obtained using the following expressions:

 

(53)

After that, detailed parametric studies were carried out to investigate the effect of boundary conditions (SSSS, CCCC, SCSC, and SFSF), thickness ratio (a/h), agglomeration stage ( ), and CNT distribution pattern across the thickness direction on the free vibration behavior of an agglomerated CNT-reinforced FG plate. These studies were carried out in order to determine how these factors influence the behavior of the plate during free vibration. Tables (5)-(10) show the non-dimensional frequencies of the first six modes for three distinct types of agglomeration stages for the FG–CNT reinforced plate. The results are computed for a/b =1 and different aspect ratios as a/h = 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100. The minimum and maximum non-dimensional frequencies for the UD, FG-V, FG-X, and FG-O types of CNT distribution over the thickness were noted for all boundary conditions taken into consideration. As a result, the maximum and minimum stiffness are produced by the UD, FG-V, FG-X, and FG-O distributions, respectively. Additionally, it was discovered that the all-side-clamped plate produces the maximum frequency parameter whereas the SFSF produces the least frequency parameters.

This is because the stiffer agglomerated CNT-reinforced functionally graded plate results from the increased limitations at the boundary. Since the present study is based on the agglomeration effect of CNT, it can be seen through the result given in Table (5)-(10) for three stages of CNT agglomeration by varying the two-agglomeration parameter and .

5.3.1.          Free Vibration Analysis Without Agglomeration Effect

In this section agglomeration effect of CNT is not considered (ζ=ξ). The result presented in Table 5 is for without agglomeration effect of CNT with varying boundary conditions and aspect ratio. It can be seen that when compared to the other three distributions, the FG-X provides the best vibrational characteristics since its natural frequencies assume higher values. This behavior is attained because the CNTs are in higher concentrations distributed to higher stress regions. It could also be noted from Table 5 that the third mode was omitted since it is symmetrical with the second mode in case all edges are simply supported and clamped.    As the aspect ratio increases the non-dimensional frequency also increases for all types of CNT distribution patterns considered in this study. But overall, one can observe that the FG-X pattern has higher stiffness as compared to other types of CNT distribution patterns. This means CNTs are present in the matrix without forming clusters. Further, the result is generated for the other two stages of the agglomeration effect as complete agglomeration and partial agglomeration stage by varying the and  parameters.

 

Table 5. The first six natural frequencies without the agglomeration effect for FG-CNT-reinforced plate
with different boundary conditions ( ).

CNT Distribution

a/h

Mode

SSSS

CCCC

SCSC

SFSF

UD CNT

5

1

14.548

22.370

18.233

14.297

2

27.364

39.433

31.158

21.791

3

27.364

39.433

35.611

27.364

4

32.117

51.485

35.932

32.419

5

32.117

51.485

37.690

33.499

6

38.698

53.275

49.969

38.822

FG-V CNT

1

12.830

20.386

16.358

13.028

2

27.488

36.346

31.242

19.694

3

27.488

36.346

32.352

27.540

4

28.688

49.285

32.628

30.641

5

28.688

51.120

37.732

32.451

6

38.648

51.120

45.652

34.745

FG-X CNT

1

16.550

23.590

19.890

15.272

2

28.102

40.145

31.999

23.560

3

28.102

40.145

37.318

28.102

4

34.760

52.853

37.620

33.293

5

34.760

52.853

38.695

34.794

6

39.742

53.544

51.284

41.781

FG-O CNT

1

11.478

18.754

14.865

11.966

2

26.203

34.176

30.005

18.394

3

26.203

34.176

30.255

27.027

4

27.027

46.712

30.775

28.537

5

27.027

50.851

37.226

32.021

6

38.223

50.851

42.760

32.028

UD CNT

10

1

15.816

27.091

21.016

17.315

2

37.828

51.884

44.532

28.381

3

37.828

51.884

44.809

42.565

4

54.728

72.949

62.317

48.726

5

54.728

86.138

65.393

54.728

6

58.200

86.943

75.380

55.758

FG-V CNT

1

13.814

23.986

18.481

15.365

2

33.216

46.327

39.440

25.748

3

33.216

46.327

39.672

37.801

4

51.330

65.450

58.184

43.216

5

55.207

77.587

62.837

50.294

6

55.207

78.288

70.228

55.036

FG-X CNT

1

18.794

30.923

24.457

19.793

2

43.863

57.502

50.420

31.319

3

43.863

57.502

50.778

47.960

4

56.205

79.573

63.998

55.316

5

56.205

92.781

72.770

56.205

6

66.210

93.742

77.390

60.948

FG-O CNT

1

12.150

21.361

16.358

13.693

2

29.489

41.763

35.294

23.604

3

29.489

41.763

35.486

33.877

4

45.922

59.477

52.479

39.169

5

54.055

70.892

61.551

45.835

6

54.055

71.454

63.636

54.055

UD CNT

20

1

16.211

29.024

22.026

18.691

2

40.028

58.037

48.492

34.614

3

40.028

58.037

48.721

44.660

4

63.292

84.112

73.294

56.541

5

78.496

101.299

89.696

65.314

6

78.496

101.930

89.844

88.388

FG-V CNT

1

14.116

25.380

19.218

16.377

2

34.911

50.913

42.414

31.021

3

34.911

50.913

42.609

40.852

4

55.288

73.979

64.242

50.490

5

68.631

89.216

78.700

57.637

6

68.631

89.746

78.824

77.590

FG-X CNT

1

19.560

34.529

26.394

22.184

2

47.912

68.183

57.500

39.133

3

47.912

68.183

57.797

55.223

4

75.200

97.871

86.169

65.000

5

92.843

117.163

104.928

75.659

6

92.843

118.000

105.127

103.299

FG-O CNT

1

12.347

22.287

16.842

14.402

2

30.623

44.903

37.306

27.883

3

30.623

44.903

37.471

35.956

4

48.631

65.491

56.689

45.557

5

60.467

79.135

69.565

51.118

6

60.467

79.579

69.669

68.604

UD CNT

50

1

16.337

29.706

22.365

19.315

2

40.774

60.403

49.926

39.788

3

40.774

60.403

50.133

48.212

4

65.193

88.930

76.480

68.349

5

81.291

107.793

94.114

69.924

6

81.291

108.321

94.238

92.877

FG-V CNT

1

14.214

25.870

19.467

16.839

2

35.490

52.640

43.482

35.009

3

35.490

52.640

43.661

42.001

4

56.786

77.592

66.673

60.849

5

70.790

94.014

82.016

61.271

6

70.790

94.466

82.123

80.946

FG-X CNT

1

19.804

35.912

27.075

23.295

2

49.353

72.832

60.317

46.887

3

49.353

72.832

60.573

58.202

4

78.772

106.928

92.189

78.413

5

98.169

129.526

113.384

83.830

6

98.169

130.191

113.541

111.863

FG-O CNT

1

12.414

22.613

17.009

14.733

2

31.014

46.055

38.021

30.883

3

31.014

46.055

38.175

36.734

4

49.672

67.978

58.365

53.505

5

61.914

82.345

71.782

54.726

6

61.914

82.733

71.874

70.849

UD CNT

100

1

16.382

29.902

22.470

19.511

2

40.992

61.021

50.319

41.567

3

40.992

61.021

50.516

48.618

4

65.908

90.547

77.596

71.359

5

81.961

109.303

95.147

76.095

6

81.961

109.781

95.261

93.889

FG-V CNT

1

14.260

26.0514

19.568

17.001

2

35.701

53.196

43.847

36.385

3

35.701

53.196

44.016

42.357

4

57.511

79.140

67.768

62.357

5

71.400

95.307

82.924

67.227

6

71.400

95.709

83.020

81.809

FG-X CNT

1

19.863

36.210

27.227

23.601

2

49.665

73.818

60.917

49.761

3

49.665

73.818

61.160

58.849

4

79.704

109.246

93.729

86.005

5

99.234

132.103

115.102

89.122

6

99.234

132.705

115.245

113.585

FG-O CNT

1

12.459

22.779

17.104

14.868

2

31.209

46.545

38.350

31.949

3

31.209

46.545

38.494

37.040

4

50.371

69.425

59.404

54.688

5

62.436

83.418

72.546

59.514

6

62.436

83.756

72.627

71.554

 

5.3.2.          Free Vibration Analysis Under Complete Agglomeration Effect

The present section deals with the complete agglomeration effect assuming that all the CNTs are aggregated in the spherically shaped inclusion. Here, in this section, three different combinations of ζ and ξ are considered for the analysis of this particular agglomeration stage. As, we can see from Table 6–8 as parameter ξ increases from 0.25 to 0.75 corresponding to ζ=1, the stage where ξ is equal to 0.25 means all CNTs are presented in the matrix as circular clusters have less stiffness as compared to ξ= 0.75 stage. The stage ζ=1 and ξ= 0.25 represents the worst case of the agglomeration stage. Next, as the value of ξ reaches towards ζ the CNTs which are present in stage 1 in a cluster will try to free from cluster effect by uniform mixing with the surrounding matrix. Overall, from Table 6 to Table 8 it can easily be understood that case 3 where ζ=1 and
 ξ= 0.75 shows a higher value of nondimensional frequency as compared to the other two stages under the complete agglomeration effect.

According to the findings of the study, the elasticity of the material would be impacted more by the agglomeration of carbon nanotubes in proportion to the degree to which the values of the agglomeration parameters differed from one another. The same explanation can also be understood by glancing at the illustration that is labeled Fig. 9. The difference in the nondimensional frequency distributions is quite significant when contrasted with the frequency distributions of other cases of complete agglomeration. The difference between the two groups of findings is rather substantial when measured against the frequencies that were acquired in the section before this one without the agglomeration stage. The natural frequencies obtained for three different cases of complete agglomeration considering the UD, FG-V, FG-X, and FG-O are listed in Table 6 – 8. From this table, one can conclude that for all cases of complete agglomeration observed, the FG-O is the CNT distribution that has the worse dynamic behavior, when comparing it with the same states of agglomeration for the other CNT distributions.

When taken as a whole, it is possible to state that, for a stage that has been entirely agglomerated, the three CNT distributions that are being investigated will have lower natural frequencies if the distribution is more heterogeneous. It is possible to arrive at the conclusion that the FG-X distribution demonstrates superior vibrational behavior in addition to the level of agglomeration because CNTs are distributed in regions with higher bending stress; despite this, the differences in natural frequencies between the distributions become smaller as the value of ξ decreases.

 

Table 6. The first six non-dimensional natural frequencies for FG-CNT-reinforced plate with a full agglomeration effect
with different boundary conditions .

CNT Distribution

a/h

Mode

SSSS

CCCC

SCSC

SFSF

UD CNT

5

1

6.689

10.212

8.351

6.498

2

12.263

17.935

13.973

9.906

3

12.263

17.935

16.246

12.263

4

14.706

23.532

16.394

14.554

5

14.706

23.532

17.150

15.226

6

17.343

24.193

22.750

17.733

FG-V CNT

1

6.535

10.021

8.178

6.372

2

12.105

17.637

13.793

9.709

3

12.105

17.637

15.946

12.105

4

14.404

23.235

16.092

14.367

5

14.404

23.235

16.933

14.955

6

17.119

23.808

22.355

17.375

FG-X CNT

1

6.704

10.210

8.357

6.498

2

12.225

17.909

13.930

9.907

3

12.225

17.909

16.238

12.225

4

14.715

23.461

16.386

14.510

5

14.715

23.461

17.098

15.213

6

17.289

24.147

22.724

17.737

FG-O CNT

1

6.527

10.025

8.1755

6.3744

2

12.134

17.661

13.826

9.7129

3

12.134

17.661

15.957

12.134

4

14.402

23.291

16.103

14.402

5

14.402

23.291

16.973

14.969

6

17.161

23.848

22.380

17.38

UD CNT

10

1

7.298

12.458

9.681

7.942

2

17.419

23.800

20.467

12.908

3

17.419

23.800

20.596

19.541

4

24.526

33.410

27.946

22.345

5

24.526

39.409

30.007

24.526

6

26.763

39.785

34.300

25.431

FG-V CNT

1

7.114

12.170

9.447

7.756

2

17.003

23.286

20.001

12.631

3

17.003

23.286

20.126

19.094

4

24.211

32.718

27.587

21.824

5

24.211

38.621

29.352

24.210

6

26.145

38.986

33.866

24.887

FG-X CNT

1

7.3233

12.487

9.708

7.960

2

17.469

23.832

20.507

12.919

3

17.469

23.832

20.637

19.576

4

24.451

33.437

27.860

22.386

5

24.451

39.425

30.050

24.451

6

26.819

39.803

34.196

25.449

FG-O CNT

1

7.098

12.153

9.430

7.7483

2

16.974

23.269

19.977

12.637

3

16.974

23.269

20.102

19.081

4

24.269

32.708

27.653

21.817

5

24.269

38.620

29.329

24.269

6

26.112

38.983

33.946

24.903

UD CNT

20

1

7.489

13.393

10.170

8.612

2

18.480

26.755

22.371

15.794

3

18.480

26.755

22.477

21.515

4

29.204

38.744

33.790

25.869

5

36.208

46.641

41.337

30.011

6

36.208

46.936

41.407

40.725

FG-V CNT

1

7.294

13.055

9.909

8.395

2

18.008

26.096

21.810

15.440

3

18.008

26.096

21.913

20.976

4

28.468

37.809

32.956

25.269

5

35.303

45.528

40.327

29.289

6

35.303

45.813

40.394

39.729

FG-X CNT

1

7.518

13.439

10.207

8.641

2

18.547

26.839

22.447

15.821

3

18.547

26.839

22.554

21.587

4

29.304

38.853

33.895

25.925

5

36.327

46.765

41.460

30.090

6

36.327

47.061

41.530

40.845

FG-O CNT

1

7.276

13.025

9.885

8.377

2

17.964

26.043

21.761

15.427

3

17.964

26.043

21.864

20.932

4

28.404

37.740

32.889

25.242

5

35.227

45.451

40.249

29.245

6

35.227

45.735

40.316

39.656

UD CNT

50

1

7.549

13.724

10.333

8.917

2

18.839

27.900

23.064

18.291

3

18.839

27.900

23.160

22.268

4

30.117

41.065

35.324

31.236

5

37.554

49.777

43.469

32.256

6

37.554

50.022

43.527

42.895

FG-V CNT

1

7.352

13.367

10.064

8.687

2

18.348

27.178

22.465

17.840

3

18.348

27.178

22.559

21.691

4

29.334

40.009

34.411

30.517

5

36.579

48.497

42.346

31.432

6

36.579

48.735

42.402

41.787

FG-X CNT

1

7.579

13.778

10.374

8.952

2

18.914

28.008

23.155

18.348

3

18.914

28.008

23.251

22.355

4

30.234

41.220

35.459

31.303

5

37.700

49.964

43.636

32.374

6

37.700

50.211

43.694

43.059

FG-O CNT

1

7.332

13.332

10.037

8.664

2

18.299

27.108

22.407

17.804

3

18.299

27.108

22.500

21.635

4

29.258

39.909

34.323

30.478

5

36.484

48.376

42.238

31.356

6

36.484

48.613

42.294

41.680

UD CNT

100

1

7.570

13.814

10.382

9.011

2

18.939

28.188

23.246

19.161

3

18.939

28.188

23.337

22.459

4

30.441

41.808

35.833

32.938

5

37.866

50.488

43.954

34.927

6

37.866

50.710

44.007

43.372

FG-V CNT

1

7.372

13.455

10.111

8.777

2

18.445

27.456

22.641

18.673

3

18.445

27.456

22.730

21.875

4

29.652

40.730

34.907

32.090

5

36.880

49.178

42.811

34.081

6

36.880

49.394

42.863

42.245

FG-X CNT

1

7.600

13.869

10.423

9.047

2

19.015

28.299

23.338

19.230

3

19.015

28.299

23.430

22.548

4

30.559

41.967

35.972

33.063

5

38.015

50.685

44.126

35.028

6

38.015

50.909

44.180

43.543

FG-O CNT

1

7.352

13.419

10.084

8.754

2

18.396

27.384

22.581

18.629

3

18.396

27.384

22.670

21.817

4

29.574

40.627

34.818

32.009

5

36.782

49.050

42.699

34.017

6

36.782

49.266

42.750

42.134

Table 7. The first six non-dimensional natural frequencies for FG-CNT-reinforced plate with a full agglomeration effect
with different boundary conditions .

CNT Distribution

a/h

Mode

SSSS

CCCC

SCSC

SFSF

UD CNT

5

1

8.417

12.883

10.522

8.209

2

15.567

22.654

17.734

12.513

3

15.567

22.654

20.499

15.567

4

18.532

29.670

20.685

18.465

5

18.532

29.670

21.656

19.237

6

22.016

30.574

28.725

22.365

FG-V CNT

1

7.893

12.226

9.9318

7.782

2

15.079

21.620

17.176

11.842

3

17.493

21.620

19.464

15.083

4

17.493

28.738

19.639

17.882

5

17.493

28.738

20.985

18.303

6

21.317

29.235

27.353

21.129

FG-X CNT

1

8.518

12.909

10.590

8.235

2

15.427

22.589

17.574

12.564

3

15.427

22.589

20.523

15.427

4

18.640

29.407

20.709

18.299

5

18.640

29.407

21.463

19.231

6

21.817

30.436

28.687

22.471

FG-O CNT

1

7.756

12.108

9.802

7.702

2

15.106

21.510

17.209

11.729

3

15.106

21.510

19.298

15.106

4

17.276

28.808

19.472

17.919

5

17.276

28.808

21.024

18.169

6

21.363

29.128

27.176

20.898

UD CNT

10

1

9.172

15.676

12.174

10.000

2

21.910

29.973

25.758

16.295

3

21.910

29.973

25.919

24.596

4

31.135

42.098

35.468

28.129

5

31.135

49.676

37.785

31.135

6

33.675

50.146

43.313

32.072

FG-V CNT

1

8.554

14.700

11.385

9.380

2

20.495

28.223

24.177

15.394

3

20.495

28.233

24.326

23.106

4

30.166

39.734

34.364

26.415

5

30.166

46.973

35.552

30.159

6

31.578

47.408

41.980

30.297

FG-X CNT

1

9.329

15.868

12.352

10.125

2

22.221

30.229

26.048

16.411

3

22.221

30.229

26.214

24.866

4

30.854

42.371

35.148

28.453

5

30.854

49.916

38.128

30.854

6

34.077

50.398

42.927

32.292

FG-O CNT

1

8.370

14.438

11.162

9.217

2

20.102

27.804

23.768

15.217

3

20.102

27.804

23.911

22.735

4

30.212

39.216

34.418

26.015

5

30.212

46.423

35.015

29.943

6

31.031

46.843

42.049

30.212

UD CNT

20

1

9.408

16.831

12.778

10.828

2

23.221

33.636

28.117

19.925

3

23.221

33.636

28.251

27.045

4

36.703

48.722

42.479

32.601

5

45.510

58.662

51.974

37.775

6

45.510

59.030

52.060

51.210

FG-V CNT

1

8.758

15.697

11.905

10.104

2

21.637

31.418

26.231

18.740

3

21.637

31.418

26.354

25.239

4

34.230

45.568

39.673

30.607

5

42.466

54.904

48.569

35.355

6

42.466

55.242

48.649

47.859

FG-X CNT

1

9.586

17.122

13.009

11.011

2

23.638

34.167

28.592

20.128

3

23.638

34.167

28.729

27.496

4

37.331

49.433

43.152

32.992

5

46.265

59.477

52.767

38.298

6

46.265

59.858

52.857

51.985

FG-O CNT

1

8.5583

15.357

11.641

9.889

2

21.158

30.774

25.672

18.447

3

21.158

30.774

25.791

24.707

4

33.496

44.675

38.859

30.105

5

41.574

53.858

47.594

34.689

6

41.574

54.184

47.671

46.906

UD CNT

50

1

9.483

17.240

12.981

11.205

2

23.665

35.052

28.975

23.018

3

23.665

35.052

29.095

27.977

4

37.834

51.596

44.379

39.388

5

47.177

62.541

54.612

40.542

6

47.177

62.849

54.684

53.892

FG-V CNT

1

8.823

16.046

12.079

10.433

2

22.023

32.635

26.970

21.505

3

22.053

32.635

27.082

26.044

4

35.218

48.059

41.323

36.974

5

43.914

58.253

50.850

37.783

6

43.914

58.538

50.918

50.182

FG-X CNT

1

9.667

17.570

13.231

11.415

2

24.121

35.710

29.526

23.381

3

24.121

35.710

29.649

28.506

4

38.553

52.547

45.210

39.851

5

48.072

63.692

55.633

41.271

6

48.072

64.007

55.707

54.898

FG-O CNT

1

8.6184

15.678

11.800

10.196

2

21.514

31.892

26.352

21.066

3

21.514

31.892

26.461

25.449

4

34.412

46.980

40.386

36.342

5

42.910

56.945

49.697

36.953

6

42.910

57.222

49.763

49.045

UD CNT

100

1

9.509

17.354

13.041

11.321

2

23.791

35.412

29.203

24.089

3

23.791

35.412

29.317

28.215

4

38.244

52.530

45.021

41.390

5

47.567

63.428

55.217

43.976

6

47.567

63.707

55.284

54.487

FG-V CNT

1

8.848

16.151

12.136

10.538

2

22.140

32.964

27.180

22.458

3

22.140

32.964

27.286

26.260

4

35.607

48.930

41.927

38.556

5

44.271

59.049

51.398

41.136

6

44.271

59.307

51.459

50.716

FG-X CNT

1

9.693

17.688

13.293

11.537

2

24.250

36.087

29.763

24.516

3

24.250

36.087

29.880

28.756

4

38.969

53.508

45.867

42.157

5

48.481

64.631

56.271

44.627

6

48.481

64.917

56.339

55.528

FG-O CNT

1

8.642

15.779

11.856

10.296

2

21.629

32.209

26.555

21.967

3

21.629

32.209

26.659

25.656

4

34.796

47.830

40.978

37.691

5

43.252

57.702

50.219

40.329

6

43.252

57.952

50.279

49.552

Table 8. The first six non-dimensional natural frequencies for FG-CNT-reinforced plate with a full agglomeration effect with different boundary conditions .

CNT Distribution

a/h

Mode

SSSS

CCCC

SCSC

SFSF

UD CNT

5

1

10.760

16.503

13.467

10.531

2

20.054

29.052

22.840

16.050

3

20.054

29.052

26.265

20.054

4

23.719

37.995

26.503

23.774

5

23.719

37.995

27.770

24.675

6

28.360

39.229

36.828

28.645

FG-V CNT

1

9.673

15.147

12.242

9.653

2

19.247

26.905

21.912

14.660

3

19.247

26.905

24.107

19.266

4

21.546

36.392

24.319

22.698

5

21.546

36.392

26.651

22.841

6

27.179

36.440

33.956

26.046

FG-X CNT

1

11.180

16.697

13.789

10.689

2

19.798

29.015

22.549

16.342

3

19.798

29.015

26.517

19.798

4

24.243

37.520

26.754

23.472

5

24.243

37.520

27.422

24.815

6

27.999

39.005

36.925

29.205

FG-O CNT

1

9.1787

14.626

11.729

9.311

2

19.215

26.271

21.885

14.202

3

19.215

26.271

23.348

19.215

4

20.677

35.711

23.554

22.081

5

20.677

36.432

26.624

22.781

6

27.174

36.432

33.050

25.106

UD CNT

10

1

11.712

20.037

15.553

12.799

2

27.993

38.341

32.930

20.918

3

27.993

38.341

33.136

31.472

4

40.108

53.877

45.680

36.017

5

40.108

63.595

48.330

40.108

6

43.046

64.194

55.541

41.144

FG-V CNT

1

10.442

18.030

13.931

11.521

2

25.073

34.724

29.665

19.070

3

25.073

34.724

29.843

28.384

4

38.537

48.978

43.701

32.453

5

38.537

57.984

43.888

37.451

6

38.700

58.512

52.695

38.503

FG-X CNT

1

12.341

20.837

16.278

13.307

2

29.267

39.477

34.153

21.430

3

29.267

39.477

34.378

32.581

4

39.597

55.166

45.099

37.331

5

39.597

64.831

49.832

39.597

6

44.726

65.472

54.844

42.087

FG-O CNT

1

9.8153

17.082

13.148

10.923

2

23.690

33.127

28.170

18.347

3

23.690

33.127

28.332

26.988

4

36.721

46.926

41.676

30.968

5

38.430

55.726

43.771

35.964

6

38.430

56.204

50.384

38.430

UD CNT

20

1

12.009

21.492

16.314

13.834

2

29.647

42.963

35.906

25.534

3

29.647

42.963

36.076

34.545

4

46.867

62.247

54.257

41.746

5

58.119

74.955

66.391

48.300

6

58.119

75.425

66.502

65.421

FG-V CNT

1

10.678

19.166

14.526

12.349

2

26.398

38.409

32.035

23.110

3

26.398

38.409

32.184

30.837

4

41.789

55.761

48.491

37.679

5

51.863

67.220

59.388

43.336

6

51.863

67.628

59.484

58.533

FG-X CNT

1

12.715

22.655

17.235

14.566

2

31.311

45.105

37.808

26.410

3

31.311

45.105

37.992

36.350

4

49.382

65.143

56.974

43.393

5

61.151

78.295

69.607

50.450

6

61.151

78.809

69.728

68.567

FG-O CNT

1

10.006

18.005

13.628

11.612

2

24.775

36.174

30.118

22.015

3

24.775

36.174

30.255

29.006

4

39.280

52.629

45.673

35.883

5

48.795

63.518

55.992

40.958

6

48.795

63.890

56.080

55.199

UD CNT

50

1

12.104

22.007

16.569

14.305

2

30.207

44.412

36.986

29.426

3

30.207

44.412

37.139

35.714

4

48.295

65.870

56.653

50.442

5

60.221

79.842

69.715

51.774

6

60.221

80.234

69.808

68.798

FG-V CNT

1

10.754

19.565

14.725

12.726

2

26.847

39.800

32.885

26.330

3

26.847

39.800

33.020

31.759

4

42.942

58.634

50.401

45.515

5

53.544

71.064

62.016

46.141

6

53.544

71.409

62.098

61.204

FG-X CNT

1

12.833

23.313

17.560

15.141

2

32.013

47.362

39.173

30.897

3

32.013

47.362

39.337

37.816

4

51.151

69.656

59.957

52.417

5

63.774

84.422

73.774

54.687

6

63.774

84.843

73.873

72.796

FG-O CNT

1

10.068

18.326

13.789

11.928

2

25.142

37.300

30.808

24.806

3

25.142

37.300

30.934

29.758

4

40.235

54.990

47.246

43.126

5

50.167

66.644

58.131

43.425

6

50.167

66.964

58.207

57.372

UD CNT

100

1

12.137

22.152

16.647

14.452

2

30.368

45.203

37.277

30.769

3

30.368

45.203

37.423

36.016

4

48.821

67.064

57.476

52.847

5

60.718

80.968

70.485

56.245

6

60.718

81.323

70.569

69.552

FG-V CNT

1

10.785

19.694

14.796

12.851

2

26.994

40.202

33.144

27.436

3

26.994

40.202

33.273

32.021

4

43.437

59.721

51.161

47.061

5

53.981

72.022

62.679

50.443

6

53.981

72.332

62.753

61.844

FG-X CNT

1

12.868

23.476

17.646

15.311

2

32.189

47.887

39.500

32.479

3

32.189

47.887

39.656

38.164

4

51.707

70.966

60.846

55.906

5

64.344

85.750

74.672

58.911

6

64.344

86.133

74.763

73.687

FG-O CNT

1

10.099

18.447

13.857

12.040

2

25.282

37.670

31.050

25.767

3

25.282

37.670

31.169

29.997

4

40.718

56.027

47.978

44.150

5

50.566

67.498

58.728

47.617

6

50.566

67.783

58.796

57.940

 

 

5.3.3.          Free Vibration Analysis Under Partial Agglomeration Effect

Similarly, we can conclude the partial agglomeration effect in which some CNTs are present in cluster form and some CNTs are present in the matrix. In this partial agglomeration stage, two types of agglomeration stages were considered for the study in which ζ and ξ will have two different values to create a partial agglomeration stage. In the first stage where ζ= 0.25 and ξ= 0.5 by assuming the maximum number of CNTs are present in the cluster form, some CNTs will present in the matrix, while in the second stage ζ= 0.75 and
ξ= 0.5 is used to show that maximum number of CNTs are present in matrix and only little percentage of CNTs are forming clusters of CNT. Comparing both stages reveals that their behavior with respect to nondimensional frequency parameters is nearly identical. Although significant differences were found for the natural frequencies when comparing both cases of agglomeration under the partial agglomeration stage with the results obtained without the agglomeration stage discussed in section 5.3.1. Here, one can see the natural mode shapes do not suffer much difference from the agglomeration effect, for these two partially agglomerated states. In Table 12, the first six nondimensional frequencies for the UD, FG-V, FG-X, and FG-O distributions are presented. The table shows highest nondimensional frequencies appear for ζ= 0.25, and once again the lesser the volume of CNTs inside the agglomerated inclusions, the better the dynamic free vibration behavior obtained in the CNT-reinforced composite. Despite the agglomeration impact, the natural mode morphologies remained constant when compared to the findings obtained without the agglomeration stage for all forms of CNT dispersion.

 

Table 9. The first six non-dimensional natural frequencies for FG-CNT-reinforced plate with a partial agglomeration effect under different boundary conditions. .

CNT Distribution

a/h

Mode

SSSS

CCCC

SCSC

SFSF

UD CNT

5

1

14.018

21.561

17.572

13.782

2

26.390

38.010

30.049

21.006

3

26.390

38.010

34.323

26.390

4

30.952

49.620

34.633

31.264

5

30.952

49.620

36.330

32.291

6

37.322

51.357

48.165

37.416

FG-V CNT

1

12.439

19.744

15.851

12.618

2

26.542

35.188

30.167

19.077

3

26.542

35.188

31.337

26.593

4

27.803

47.710

31.604

29.673

5

27.803

49.339

36.415

31.339

6

37.322

49.339

44.213

33.665

FG-X CNT

1

15.946

22.757

19.177

14.734

2

27.124

38.749

30.884

22.722

3

27.124

38.749

36.004

27.124

4

33.521

50.973

36.297

32.132

5

33.521

50.973

37.325

33.578

6

38.359

51.693

49.497

40.299

FG-O CNT

1

11.131

18.173

14.410

11.595

2

25.400

33.100

29.073

17.818

3

25.400

33.100

29.315

26.090

4

26.090

45.232

29.708

27.646

5

26.090

49.052

35.915

30.908

6

36.897

49.052

41.421

31.040

UD CNT

10

1

15.238

26.104

20.249

16.692

2

36.448

49.998

42.911

27.378

3

36.448

49.998

43.177

41.033

4

52.781

70.301

60.099

46.988

5

52.781

83.015

63.016

52.781

6

56.080

83.790

72.661

53.789

FG-V CNT

1

13.397

23.252

17.919

14.895

2

32.208

44.898

38.233

24.942

3

32.208

44.898

38.457

36.641

4

49.765

63.420

56.395

41.889

5

53.302

75.172

60.668

48.729

6

53.302

75.852

68.062

53.143

FG-X CNT

1

18.093

29.792

23.555

19.072

2

42.247

55.427

48.582

30.197

3

42.247

55.427

48.927

46.220

4

54.249

76.722

61.769

53.300

5

54.249

89.475

70.140

54.249

6

63.793

90.400

74.651

58.776

FG-O CNT

1

11.786

20.715

15.866

13.278

2

28.601

40.490

34.225

22.870

3

28.601

40.490

34.411

32.850

4

44.534

57.655

50.882

37.970

5

52.181

68.712

59.416

44.425

6

52.181

69.259

61.693

52.181

UD CNT

20

1

15.619

27.963

21.221

18.010

2

38.565

55.919

46.721

33.367

3

38.565

55.919

46.941

44.960

4

60.979

81.043

70.618

54.502

5

75.629

97.605

86.422

62.948

6

75.629

98.213

86.565

85.169

FG-V CNT

1

13.691

24.612

18.638

15.881

2

33.858

49.369

41.132

30.062

3

33.858

49.369

41.320

39.615

4

53.618

71.729

62.295

48.932

5

66.556

86.499

76.312

55.880

6

66.556

87.015

76.433

75.235

FG-X CNT

1

18.826

33.241

25.406

21.359

2

46.120

65.655

55.359

37.719

3

46.120

65.655

55.643

53.169

4

72.396

94.258

82.973

62.616

5

89.390

112.851

101.046

72.884

6

89.390

113.655

101.237

99.481

FG-O CNT

1

11.978

21.620

16.339

13.971

2

29.708

43.555

36.189

27.030

3

29.708

43.555

36.349

34.878

4

47.176

63.520

54.988

44.156

5

58.655

76.752

67.476

49.577

6

58.655

77.183

67.577

66.543

UD CNT

50

1

15.739

28.620

21.547

18.609

2

39.282

58.194

48.100

38.340

3

39.282

58.194

48.300

46.449

4

62.809

85.679

73.684

65.875

5

78.318

103.852

90.672

67.371

6

78.318

104.361

90.792

89.482

FG-V CNT

1

13.787

25.091

18.881

16.331

2

34.421

51.054

42.173

33.945

3

34.421

51.054

42.346

40.736

4

55.076

75.251

64.663

58.993

5

68.658

91.178

79.545

59.402

6

68.658

91.617

79.648

78.506

FG-X CNT

1

19.058

34.561

26.056

22.421

2

47.496

70.096

58.050

45.153

3

47.496

70.096

58.296

56.015

4

75.810

102.917

88.727

75.553

5

94.479

124.669

109.127

80.693

6

94.479

125.309

109.278

107.664

FG-O CNT

1

12.044

21.938

16.502

14.292

2

30.088

44.679

36.886

29.954

3

30.088

44.679

37.036

35.637

4

48.188

65.945

56.621

51.902

5

60.066

79.884

69.638

53.056

6

60.066

80.261

69.727

68.733

UD CNT

100

1

15.783

28.808

21.648

18.797

2

39.493

58.789

48.479

40.049

3

39.493

58.789

48.668

46.840

4

63.498

87.237

74.760

68.751

5

78.963

105.306

91.668

73.328

6

78.963

105.767

91.778

90.455

FG-V CNT

1

13.831

25.266

18.979

16.489

2

34.626

51.592

42.526

35.284

3

34.626

51.592

42.689

41.081

4

55.775

76.747

65.720

60.472

5

69.248

92.433

80.425

65.177

6

69.248

92.823

80.518

79.344

FG-X CNT

1

19.115

34.847

26.202

22.713

2

47.795

71.041

58.624

47.902

3

47.795

71.041

58.858

56.634

4

76.706

105.140

90.205

82.777

5

95.499

127.135

110.772

85.839

6

95.499

127.714

110.909

109.312

FG-O CNT

1

12.087

22.098

16.593

14.423

2

30.276

45.153

37.203

30.990

3

30.276

45.153

37.343

35.933

4

48.862

67.341

57.622

53.047

5

60.571

80.922

70.377

57.7156

6

60.571

81.251

70.456

69.416

Table 10. The first six non-dimensional natural frequencies for FG-CNT-reinforced plate with a partial agglomeration effect under different boundary conditions .

CNT Distribution

a/h

Mode

SSSS

CCCC

SCSC

SFSF

UD CNT

5

1

13.632

20.962

17.085

13.397

2

25.640

36.950

29.196

20.419

3

25.640

36.950

33.369

25.640

4

30.095

48.243

33.670

30.377

5

30.095

48.243

35.317

31.389

6

36.261

49.921

46.822

36.377

FG-V CNT

1

12.134

19.231

15.450

12.287

2

25.705

34.259

29.220

18.581

3

25.705

34.259

30.530

25.754

4

27.109

46.445

30.790

28.895

5

27.109

47.854

35.295

30.366

6

36.158

47.854

43.067

32.810

FG-X CNT

1

15.422

22.081

18.581

14.282

2

26.270

37.650

29.913

22.011

3

26.270

37.650

34.945

26.270

4

32.496

49.404

35.231

31.123

5

32.496

49.404

36.171

32.595

6

37.152

50.255

48.087

39.072

FG-O CNT

1

10.891

17.752

14.087

11.323

2

24.831

32.301

28.395

17.386

3

24.831

32.301

28.632

25.299

4

25.299

44.122

28.808

26.990

5

25.299

47.599

34.846

29.974

6

35.779

47.599

40.435

30.327

UD CNT

10

1

14.821

25.385

19.693

16.231

2

35.447

48.617

41.729

26.613

3

35.447

48.617

41.988

39.901

4

51.281

68.356

58.392

45.688

5

51.281

80.715

61.276

51.281

6

54.536

81.469

70.634

52.291

FG-V CNT

1

13.072

22.675

17.480

14.522

2

31.421

43.770

37.286

24.286

3

31.421

43.770

37.506

35.728

4

48.544

61.817

54.989

40.841

5

51.607

73.261

58.740

47.475

6

51.607

73.925

66.358

51.463

FG-X CNT

1

17.462

28.807

22.755

18.437

2

40.821

53.667

46.995

29.221

3

40.821

53.667

47.327

44.718

4

52.541

74.337

59.827

51.538

5

52.541

86.740

67.900

52.541

6

61.697

87.636

72.342

56.923

FG-O CNT

1

11.539

20.269

15.529

12.989

2

27.993

39.597

33.483

22.328

3

27.993

39.597

33.666

32.133

4

43.573

56.362

49.763

37.115

5

50.599

67.156

57.616

43.409

6

50.599

67.693

60.324

50.599

UD CNT

20

1

15.191

27.196

20.635

17.515

2

37.508

54.384

45.439

32.440

3

37.508

54.384

45.653

43.726

4

59.307

78.816

68.680

52.991

5

73.555

94.922

84.049

61.212

6

73.555

95.513

84.188

82.829

FG-V CNT

1

13.360

24.014

18.187

15.493

2

33.039

48.163

40.132

29.291

3

33.039

48.163

40.316

38.650

4

52.318

69.970

60.776

47.681

5

64.940

84.374

74.449

54.497

6

64.940

84.878

74.567

73.396

FG-X CNT

1

18.154

32.079

24.508

20.613

2

44.493

63.398

53.432

36.467

3

44.493

63.398

53.705

51.322

4

69.869

91.060

80.118

60.489

5

86.290

109.055

97.594

70.417

6

86.290

109.828

97.777

96.087

FG-O CNT

1

11.730

21.167

15.998

13.676

2

29.088

42.636

35.429

26.421

3

29.088

42.636

35.587

34.145

4

46.187

62.170

53.827

43.147

5

57.423

75.115

66.048

48.512

6

57.423

75.538

66.147

65.133

UD CNT

50

1

15.309

27.836

20.957

18.099

2

38.207

56.601

46.783

37.284

3

38.207

56.601

46.977

45.177

4

61.089

83.332

71.666

64.047

5

76.174

101.007

88.189

65.523

6

76.174

101.502

88.306

87.031

FG-V CNT

1

13.454

24.484

18.425

15.936

2

33.590

49.818

41.154

33.107

3

33.590

49.818

41.323

39.751

4

53.744

73.426

63.097

57.518

5

67.000

88.970

77.621

57.926

6

67.000

89.398

77.722

76.607

FG-X CNT

1

18.374

33.325

25.123

21.621

2

45.794

67.599

55.975

43.585

3

45.794

67.599

56.213

54.016

4

73.100

99.263

85.566

72.993

5

91.105

120.248

105.243

77.835

6

91.105

120.864

105.389

103.834

FG-O CNT

1

11.794

21.483

16.160

13.995

2

29.465

43.750

36.120

29.314

3

29.465

43.750

36.267

34.897

4

47.186

64.568

55.441

50.813

5

58.819

78.220

68.190

51.869

6

58.819

78.589

68.277

67.304

UD CNT

100

1

15.351

28.019

21.055

18.282

2

38.411

57.180

47.151

38.950

3

38.411

57.180

47.336

45.557

4

61.759

84.847

72.712

66.867

5

76.801

102.422

89.158

71.304

6

76.801

102.871

89.265

87.978

FG-V CNT

1

13.497

24.654

18.520

16.090

2

33.788

50.341

41.496

34.421

3

33.788

50.341

41.655

40.087

4

54.419

74.875

64.120

58.998

5

67.573

90.191

78.476

63.552

6

67.573

90.573

78.568

77.423

FG-X CNT

1

18.429

33.597

25.261

21.900

2

46.080

68.496

56.522

46.206

3

46.080

68.496

56.747

54.604

4

73.957

101.381

86.976

79.822

5

92.074

122.586

106.803

82.871

6

92.074

123.144

106.936

105.396

FG-O CNT

1

11.836

21.638

16.248

14.123

2

29.647

44.211

36.428

30.336

3

29.647

44.211

36.565

35.185

4

47.837

65.920

56.410

51.930

5

59.310

79.232

68.909

56.466

6

59.310

79.555

68.987

67.970

 

 

The influence that the side-to-thickness ratio has on the nondimensional fundamental frequency of FG-CNT reinforced plate is illustrated in Fig. (10)-(15). For the different boundary conditions of SSSS, CCCC, SCSC, and SFSF, the results are calculated for =0.075. Here, it can be seen that the a/h ratio increases with increasing dimensionless frequency parameters, and it becomes insensitive after
a/h = 50 for all applied boundary conditions.

Overall, from the three stages of the agglomeration effect, without agglomeration stage led to give higher non-dimensional frequency as compared to the other two stages because nonuniform CNT distribution in the matrix affects the overall material properties of the nanocomposite. The effect if not considered will propagate the erroneous overall result.

 

Fig. 10. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. a/h ratio for different types of CNT-reinforced plate with various boundary conditions, including without
agglomeration effect

 

Fig. 11. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. a/h ratio for different types of CNT-reinforced plate with various boundary conditions for complete agglomeration
effect (Case-1).

 

Fig. 12. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. a/h ratio for different types of CNT-reinforced plate with various boundary conditions for complete agglomeration
effect (Case-2).

 

 

Fig. 13. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. a/h ratio for different types of CNT-reinforced plate with various boundary conditions for complete agglomeration
effect (Case-3)

 

Fig. 14. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. a/h ratio for different types of CNT-reinforced plate with various boundary conditions for partial agglomeration
effect (Case-1)

 

Fig. 15. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. a/h ratio for different types of CNT-reinforced plate with various boundary conditions for partial agglomeration
effect (Case-2)

 

Fig. 16. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. agglomeration parameter ξ for different types of CNT reinforced plate with different boundary conditions for complete agglomeration effect for a/h =5 (Case-1)

 

Fig. 17. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. agglomeration parameter ξ for different types of CNT reinforced plate with different boundary conditions for complete agglomeration effect for a/h =10 (Case-2)

 

Fig. 18. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. agglomeration parameter ξ for different types of CNT-reinforced plate with different boundary conditions for complete agglomeration effect for a/h =20 (Case-3)

 

Fig. 19. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. agglomeration parameter ξ for different types of CNT reinforced plate with different boundary conditions for complete agglomeration effect for a/h =50 (Case-3).

 

Fig. 20. Variation of dimensionless frequency vs. agglomeration parameter ξ for different types of CNT reinforced plate with different boundary conditions for complete agglomeration effect for a/h =100 (Case-5)

6.     Conclusions

In the current work, an investigation into the free vibration behavior of CNT-reinforced functionally graded plates, including the effect of agglomeration, was carried out using a C0 FE model that was developed using Reddy's HSDT. It is presumed that the CNT distribution will be uniform or functionally graded all the way through the thickness of the plate. The Eshelby-Mori-Tanaka approach, which is based on a two-parameter model ζ and ξ, is utilized in order to compute the properties of an agglomerated CNT-reinforced composite plate at any point. By adjusting these two parameters, it was possible to capture all three stages of the agglomeration effect. Several parametric studies were conducted to determine the effect of reinforcing phase features such as agglomeration and volume fraction distribution along the thickness. These studies examine how these factors affect the dynamic behavior of these structures.

The most important contribution of this work was the introduction of the carbon nanotube agglomeration model into the constitutive rules that define mechanical behavior. In addition, Reddy's well-known HSDT model is utilized in order to perform an analysis of the free vibrations of plates with varying parameters such as aspect ratio, CNT distribution across the thickness, and three distinct stages of agglomeration. The overall concise outcomes of the present study are as follows:

  • The FG-X type distribution of carbon nanotubes along the thickness direction provided higher natural frequencies when compared to the other three distributions that were considered for the same state of agglomeration. This was the case regardless of whether or not there was any agglomeration present, in any of the three different cases of complete agglomeration, or either of the two states of partial agglomeration. This is due to a larger concentration of carbon nanotubes in locations that experience significant levels of bending stress.
  • According to the findings of the study, having a lower value for the parameter ξ causes the free vibration behavior of these structures to worsen, which in turn results in lower natural frequencies for all of the other three CNT distribution patterns.
  • Similarly, the partial agglomeration stage concludes that the higher the agglomeration parameter ζ, the lower the natural frequencies for the carbon nanotube distributions considered.
  • There is an increase in dimensionless frequency with an increased aspect ratio.
  • Greater boundary restrictions produce higher values for the dimensionless frequency parameters.
  • Among the three stages of the agglomeration effect of CNTs, the without agglomeration stage led to higher non-dimensional frequency parameters as compared to the complete agglomeration stage and partial agglomeration stage.

Nomenclature

CNT

Carbon nanotube

FG

Functionally Graded Materials

h

Thickness

UD

Uniformly Distributed

 

Carbon nanotube volume fraction

SSSS

All four edges simply supported

CCCC

All four edges clamped

SCSC

Two adjacent edges simply supported and the remaining two adjacent edges clamped

SFSF

Two adjacent edges simply supported and the remaining two adjacent edges Free

FG-V

V-Type CNT distribution pattern along the thickness direction

FG-X

X-Type CNT distribution pattern along the thickness direction

FG-O

O-Type CNT distribution pattern along the thickness direction

ζ, ξ

Agglomeration parameter

Ni

Shape function

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur U.P-273010 India, for the financial support of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The corresponding author declares that there are no competing interests on behalf of the other authors.

References

[1]   Iijima, S., 1991. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. nature, 354(6348), pp.56-58.

[2]   Iijima, S. and Ichihashi, T., 1993. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. nature, 363(6430), pp.603-605.

[3]   Liew, K.M., Lei, Z.X. and Zhang, L.W., 2015. Mechanical analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composites: a review. Composite Structures, 120, pp.90-97.

[4]   Aragh, B.S., Barati, A.N. and Hedayati, H., 2012. Eshelby–Mori–Tanaka approach for vibrational behavior of continuously graded carbon nanotube-reinforced cylindrical panels. Composites Part B: Engineering, 43(4), pp.1943-1954.

[5]   Mareishi, S., Kalhori, H., Rafiee, M. and Hosseini, S.M., 2015. Nonlinear forced vibration response of smart two-phase nano-composite beams to external harmonic excitations. Curved and Layered Structures, 2(1).

[6]   Alibeigloo, A. and Liew, K.M., 2013. Thermoelastic analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite plate using theory of elasticity. Composite Structures, 106, pp.873-881.

[7]   Alibeigloo, A., 2014. Free vibration analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical panel embedded in piezoelectric layers by using theory of elasticity. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 44, pp.104-115.

[8]   Zhang, L.W., Lei, Z.X. and Liew, K.M., 2015. Vibration characteristic of moderately thick functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite skew plates. Composite Structures, 122, pp.172-183.

[9]   Zhang, L.W., Lei, Z.X. and Liew, K.M., 2015. Computation of vibration solution for functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite thick plates resting on elastic foundations using the element-free IMLS-Ritz method. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 256, pp.488-504..

[10] Shi, D.L., Feng, X.Q., Huang, Y.Y., Hwang, K.C. and Gao, H., 2004. The effect of nanotube waviness and agglomeration on the elastic property of carbon nanotube-reinforced composites. J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 126(3), pp.250-257.

[11] Mori, T. and Tanaka, K., 1973. Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta metallurgica, 21(5), pp.571-574.

[12] Hedayati, H. and Aragh, B.S., 2012. Influence of graded agglomerated CNTs on vibration of CNT-reinforced annular sectorial plates resting on Pasternak foundation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(17), pp.8715-8735.

[13] Aragh, B.S., Farahani, E.B. and Barati, A.N., 2013. Natural frequency analysis of continuously graded carbon nanotube-reinforced cylindrical shells based on third-order shear deformation theory. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 18(3), pp.264-284.

[14] Formica, G., Lacarbonara, W. and Alessi, R., 2010. Vibrations of carbon nanotube-reinforced composites. Journal of sound and vibration, 329(10), pp.1875-1889.

[15] Hosseini-Hashemi, S., Taher, H.R.D., Akhavan, H. and Omidi, M., 2010. Free vibration of functionally graded rectangular plates using first-order shear deformation plate theory. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(5), pp.1276-1291.

[16] Ramu, I. and Mohanty, S.C., 2012. Study on free vibration analysis of rectangular plate structures using finite element method. Procedia engineering, 38, pp.2758-2766.

[17] Thai, H.T. and Kim, S.E., 2013. A simple higher-order shear deformation theory for bending and free vibration analysis of functionally graded plates. Composite Structures, 96, pp.165-173.

[18] Tornabene, F., Fantuzzi, N., Bacciocchi, M. and Viola, E., 2016. Effect of agglomeration on the natural frequencies of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced laminated composite doubly-curved shells. Composites Part B: Engineering, 89, pp.187-218.

[19] Kiani, Y., 2016. Free vibration of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite plates integrated with piezoelectric layers. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 72(9), pp.2433-2449.

[20] Van Long, N., Quoc, T.H. and Tu, T.M., 2016. Bending and free vibration analysis of functionally graded plates using new eight-unknown shear deformation theory by finite-element method. International journal of advanced structural engineering, 8(4), pp.391-399.

[21] Moghadam, H.Z., Faghidian, S.A. and Jamal-Omidi, M., 2018. Agglomeration effects of carbon nanotube on residual stresses in polymer nano composite using experimental and analytical method. Materials Research Express, 6(3), p.035009.

[22] Daghigh, H. and Daghigh, V., 2019. Free vibration of size and temperature‐dependent carbon nanotube (CNT)‐reinforced composite nanoplates with CNT agglomeration. Polymer Composites, 40(S2), pp.E1479-E1494.

[23] Tavakoli Maleki, A., Pourseifi, M. and Zakeri, M., 2022. Effect of agglomeration of the nanotubes on the vibration frequency of the multi-scale hybrid nanocomposite conical shells: a GDQ-based study. Waves in Random and Complex Media, 32(1), pp.359-380.

[24] Eshelby, J.D., 1957. The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A. Mathematical and physical sciences, 241(1226), pp.376-396.

[25] Benveniste, Y., 1987. A new approach to the application of Mori-Tanaka's theory in composite materials. Mechanics of materials, 6(2), pp.147-157.

[26] Shokrieh, M.M. and Rafiee, R., 2010. On the tensile behavior of an embedded carbon nanotube in polymer matrix with non-bonded interphase region. Composite Structures, 92(3), pp.647-652.

[27] Yas, M.H. and Heshmati, M., 2012. Dynamic analysis of functionally graded nanocomposite beams reinforced by randomly oriented carbon nanotube under the action of moving load. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(4), pp.1371-1394.

[28] Kamarian, S., Shakeri, M., Yas, M.H., Bodaghi, M. and Pourasghar, A., 2015. Free vibration analysis of functionally graded nanocomposite sandwich beams resting on Pasternak foundation by considering the agglomeration effect of CNTs. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 17(6), pp.632-665.

[29] Taj, M.G., Chakrabarti, A. and Sheikh, A.H., 2013. Analysis of functionally graded plates using higher order shear deformation theory. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(18-19), pp.8484-8494.

[30] Stephan, C., Nguyen, T.P., De La Chapelle, M.L., Lefrant, S., Journet, C. and Bernier, P., 2000. Characterization of singlewalled carbon nanotubes-PMMA composites. Synthetic Metals, 108(2), pp.139-149.

[31] Shen, L. and Li, J., 2004. Transversely isotropic elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B, 69(4), p.045414.

[32] Talha, M. and Singh, B., 2010. Static response and free vibration analysis of FGM plates using higher order shear deformation theory. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(12), pp.3991-4011.

[33] Odegard, G.M., Gates, T.S., Wise, K.E., Park, C. and Siochi, E.J., 2003. Constitutive modeling of nanotube–reinforced polymer composites. Composites science and technology, 63(11), pp.1671-1687.

[34] Zhang, L.W., Zhang, Y., Zou, G.L. and Liew, K.M., 2016. Free vibration analysis of triangular CNT-reinforced composite plates subjected to in-plane stresses using FSDT element-free method. Composite structures, 149, pp.247-260.

[35] Zhang, L.W., 2017. On the study of the effect of in-plane forces on the frequency parameters of CNT-reinforced composite skew plates. Composite Structures, 160, pp.824-837.

[36] Zhang, L.W. and Selim, B.A., 2017. Vibration analysis of CNT-reinforced thick laminated composite plates based on Reddy’s higher-order shear deformation theory. Composite Structures, 160, pp.689-705.

[37] Mehar, K. and Kumar Panda, S., 2018. Thermal free vibration behavior of FG‐CNT reinforced sandwich curved panel using finite element method. Polymer Composites, 39(8), pp.2751-2764.

[38] Mehar, K., Panda, S.K. and Mahapatra, T.R., 2017. Theoretical and experimental investigation of vibration characteristic of carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composite structure. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 133, pp.319-329.

[39] Mehar, K., Panda, S.K. and Patle, B.K., 2018. Stress, deflection, and frequency analysis of CNT reinforced graded sandwich plate under uniform and linear thermal environment: A finite element approach. Polymer Composites, 39(10), pp.3792-3809.

[40] Mehar, K., Panda, S.K. and Patle, B.K., 2017. Thermoelastic vibration and flexural behavior of FG-CNT reinforced composite curved panel. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 9(04), p.1750046.

[41] Liew, K.M., Pan, Z. and Zhang, L.W., 2020. The recent progress of functionally graded CNT reinforced composites and structures. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 63(3), pp.1-17.

[1]   Iijima, S., 1991. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. nature, 354(6348), pp.56-58.
[2]   Iijima, S. and Ichihashi, T., 1993. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. nature, 363(6430), pp.603-605.
[3]   Liew, K.M., Lei, Z.X. and Zhang, L.W., 2015. Mechanical analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composites: a review. Composite Structures, 120, pp.90-97.
[4]   Aragh, B.S., Barati, A.N. and Hedayati, H., 2012. Eshelby–Mori–Tanaka approach for vibrational behavior of continuously graded carbon nanotube-reinforced cylindrical panels. Composites Part B: Engineering, 43(4), pp.1943-1954.
[5]   Mareishi, S., Kalhori, H., Rafiee, M. and Hosseini, S.M., 2015. Nonlinear forced vibration response of smart two-phase nano-composite beams to external harmonic excitations. Curved and Layered Structures, 2(1).
[6]   Alibeigloo, A. and Liew, K.M., 2013. Thermoelastic analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite plate using theory of elasticity. Composite Structures, 106, pp.873-881.
[7]   Alibeigloo, A., 2014. Free vibration analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical panel embedded in piezoelectric layers by using theory of elasticity. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 44, pp.104-115.
[8]   Zhang, L.W., Lei, Z.X. and Liew, K.M., 2015. Vibration characteristic of moderately thick functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite skew plates. Composite Structures, 122, pp.172-183.
[9]   Zhang, L.W., Lei, Z.X. and Liew, K.M., 2015. Computation of vibration solution for functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite thick plates resting on elastic foundations using the element-free IMLS-Ritz method. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 256, pp.488-504..
[10] Shi, D.L., Feng, X.Q., Huang, Y.Y., Hwang, K.C. and Gao, H., 2004. The effect of nanotube waviness and agglomeration on the elastic property of carbon nanotube-reinforced composites. J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 126(3), pp.250-257.
[11] Mori, T. and Tanaka, K., 1973. Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta metallurgica, 21(5), pp.571-574.
[12] Hedayati, H. and Aragh, B.S., 2012. Influence of graded agglomerated CNTs on vibration of CNT-reinforced annular sectorial plates resting on Pasternak foundation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(17), pp.8715-8735.
[13] Aragh, B.S., Farahani, E.B. and Barati, A.N., 2013. Natural frequency analysis of continuously graded carbon nanotube-reinforced cylindrical shells based on third-order shear deformation theory. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 18(3), pp.264-284.
[14] Formica, G., Lacarbonara, W. and Alessi, R., 2010. Vibrations of carbon nanotube-reinforced composites. Journal of sound and vibration, 329(10), pp.1875-1889.
[15] Hosseini-Hashemi, S., Taher, H.R.D., Akhavan, H. and Omidi, M., 2010. Free vibration of functionally graded rectangular plates using first-order shear deformation plate theory. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(5), pp.1276-1291.
[16] Ramu, I. and Mohanty, S.C., 2012. Study on free vibration analysis of rectangular plate structures using finite element method. Procedia engineering, 38, pp.2758-2766.
[17] Thai, H.T. and Kim, S.E., 2013. A simple higher-order shear deformation theory for bending and free vibration analysis of functionally graded plates. Composite Structures, 96, pp.165-173.
[18] Tornabene, F., Fantuzzi, N., Bacciocchi, M. and Viola, E., 2016. Effect of agglomeration on the natural frequencies of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced laminated composite doubly-curved shells. Composites Part B: Engineering, 89, pp.187-218.
[19] Kiani, Y., 2016. Free vibration of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite plates integrated with piezoelectric layers. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 72(9), pp.2433-2449.
[20] Van Long, N., Quoc, T.H. and Tu, T.M., 2016. Bending and free vibration analysis of functionally graded plates using new eight-unknown shear deformation theory by finite-element method. International journal of advanced structural engineering, 8(4), pp.391-399.
[21] Moghadam, H.Z., Faghidian, S.A. and Jamal-Omidi, M., 2018. Agglomeration effects of carbon nanotube on residual stresses in polymer nano composite using experimental and analytical method. Materials Research Express, 6(3), p.035009.
[22] Daghigh, H. and Daghigh, V., 2019. Free vibration of size and temperature‐dependent carbon nanotube (CNT)‐reinforced composite nanoplates with CNT agglomeration. Polymer Composites, 40(S2), pp.E1479-E1494.
[23] Tavakoli Maleki, A., Pourseifi, M. and Zakeri, M., 2022. Effect of agglomeration of the nanotubes on the vibration frequency of the multi-scale hybrid nanocomposite conical shells: a GDQ-based study. Waves in Random and Complex Media, 32(1), pp.359-380.
[24] Eshelby, J.D., 1957. The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A. Mathematical and physical sciences, 241(1226), pp.376-396.
[25] Benveniste, Y., 1987. A new approach to the application of Mori-Tanaka's theory in composite materials. Mechanics of materials, 6(2), pp.147-157.
[26] Shokrieh, M.M. and Rafiee, R., 2010. On the tensile behavior of an embedded carbon nanotube in polymer matrix with non-bonded interphase region. Composite Structures, 92(3), pp.647-652.
[27] Yas, M.H. and Heshmati, M., 2012. Dynamic analysis of functionally graded nanocomposite beams reinforced by randomly oriented carbon nanotube under the action of moving load. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(4), pp.1371-1394.
[28] Kamarian, S., Shakeri, M., Yas, M.H., Bodaghi, M. and Pourasghar, A., 2015. Free vibration analysis of functionally graded nanocomposite sandwich beams resting on Pasternak foundation by considering the agglomeration effect of CNTs. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 17(6), pp.632-665.
[29] Taj, M.G., Chakrabarti, A. and Sheikh, A.H., 2013. Analysis of functionally graded plates using higher order shear deformation theory. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(18-19), pp.8484-8494.
[30] Stephan, C., Nguyen, T.P., De La Chapelle, M.L., Lefrant, S., Journet, C. and Bernier, P., 2000. Characterization of singlewalled carbon nanotubes-PMMA composites. Synthetic Metals, 108(2), pp.139-149.
[31] Shen, L. and Li, J., 2004. Transversely isotropic elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B, 69(4), p.045414.
[32] Talha, M. and Singh, B., 2010. Static response and free vibration analysis of FGM plates using higher order shear deformation theory. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(12), pp.3991-4011.
[33] Odegard, G.M., Gates, T.S., Wise, K.E., Park, C. and Siochi, E.J., 2003. Constitutive modeling of nanotube–reinforced polymer composites. Composites science and technology, 63(11), pp.1671-1687.
[34] Zhang, L.W., Zhang, Y., Zou, G.L. and Liew, K.M., 2016. Free vibration analysis of triangular CNT-reinforced composite plates subjected to in-plane stresses using FSDT element-free method. Composite structures, 149, pp.247-260.
[35] Zhang, L.W., 2017. On the study of the effect of in-plane forces on the frequency parameters of CNT-reinforced composite skew plates. Composite Structures, 160, pp.824-837.
[36] Zhang, L.W. and Selim, B.A., 2017. Vibration analysis of CNT-reinforced thick laminated composite plates based on Reddy’s higher-order shear deformation theory. Composite Structures, 160, pp.689-705.
[37] Mehar, K. and Kumar Panda, S., 2018. Thermal free vibration behavior of FG‐CNT reinforced sandwich curved panel using finite element method. Polymer Composites, 39(8), pp.2751-2764.
[38] Mehar, K., Panda, S.K. and Mahapatra, T.R., 2017. Theoretical and experimental investigation of vibration characteristic of carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composite structure. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 133, pp.319-329.
[39] Mehar, K., Panda, S.K. and Patle, B.K., 2018. Stress, deflection, and frequency analysis of CNT reinforced graded sandwich plate under uniform and linear thermal environment: A finite element approach. Polymer Composites, 39(10), pp.3792-3809.
[40] Mehar, K., Panda, S.K. and Patle, B.K., 2017. Thermoelastic vibration and flexural behavior of FG-CNT reinforced composite curved panel. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 9(04), p.1750046.
[41] Liew, K.M., Pan, Z. and Zhang, L.W., 2020. The recent progress of functionally graded CNT reinforced composites and structures. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 63(3), pp.1-17.