Document Type : Research Article
Authors
1 Mechanical & Industrial Section, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Nizwa, Sultanate of Oman
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India
3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ramco Institute of Technology, Rajapalayam 626117, India
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
Optimization of Wear Behaviour on Mg-TiO2 Nanocomposite Using Taguchi Grey Relational Analysis
a Mechanical & Industrial Section, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Nizwa, Sultanate of Oman
b Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India
c Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ramco Institute of Technology, Rajapalayam 626117, India
KEYWORDS |
|
ABSTRACT |
Optimization; Process parameters; Wear; ANOVA; Grey relational grade. |
In this research, the dry sliding wear behaviour of the Mg-TiO2 nanocomposite is analyzed by conducting a wear test using a pin-on-disc wear testing machine under normal atmospheric conditions. The process parameters considered during the test are the weight fraction of TiO2 nanoparticles, normal load, and sliding speed. The sliding distance and wear track diameter are maintained constant at 1500 m and 90 mm respectively during the test. The performance measures are cumulative wear and coefficient of friction. Taguchi-based Grey relational analysis is employed in this study to optimize the performance of the wear behaviour of the nanocomposite. The design of experiments considered in this study is L9 orthogonal array with each process parameter for three levels. Grey relational grade (GRG) is computed for each experiment and it was found that the maximum GRG of 0.825 is obtained for the process parameter combination A3B2C1 which corresponds to 5wt% TiO2, 1 kg normal load and 1.5 m/s sliding speed respectively. The initial GRG estimated is compared with the predicted and experimental values for the optimum process parameters and it was found that there is an improvement in GRG by 2.2% and 0.77% respectively. ANOVA (Analysis of variance) is carried out to estimate the process parameter that influences the wear behaviour of the nanocomposite significantly and later concluded that the process parameter normal load is the most significant factor other than any other factors. |
Pure magnesium and magnesium-based metal matrix composites are emerging as a new class of engineering materials with applications in aerospace, automobiles, structural engineering, and biomedical. Magnesium alloys and composites have recently attracted much interest due to their specific characteristics, such as low density and high specific strength despite having low creep resistance, wear resistance, and modulus. [1] The reason for this is that adding appropriate reinforcements in the right form can considerably improve the material's above-mentioned qualities. For example, adding particle reinforcements such as Titanium oxide (TiO2), Titanium carbide (TiC), Silicon carbide (SiC), Aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and others to pure Mg or Mg alloys may greatly improve the material's mechanical behaviour. [2-4] Due to magnesium's affinity for oxygen, the processing and manufacture of magnesium-based composites are thought to be more difficult. As a result, the initial cost of producing magnesium-based composites was raised. In order to solve this challenge, the powder-based fabrication method is preferred, which has become increasingly popular in recent years, as they are easier to fabricate and more cost-effective. When opposed to liquid-state processing processes, powder metallurgy has fewer oxidation and flammability concerns. Though magnesium-based composites have a number of drawbacks, low wear resistance has received increasing attention as a result of magnesium's use in vehicle and biomedical applications. [5] The wear behaviour of the material has a greater impact on performance in these applications than any other mechanical properties. Wear resistance can be greatly enhanced by combining strong ceramic reinforcements such as Titanium oxide (TiO2), Titanium carbide (TiC), Silicon carbide (SiC), Aluminium oxide (Al2O3), and others with pure magnesium or magnesium alloys. [4-7] With these materials obtained for investigation, several researchers and scientists have put in a tremendous lot of effort. These studies have produced a number of scientific hypotheses, concepts, and empirical models related to the wear behaviour of magnesium composites. A few of the most well-known works of literature on magnesium wear studies, process parameter optimization using various optimization techniques, including Grey Relational Analysis (GRA), are reviewed in-depth for a better understanding of the scope and importance of reinforcement and processing conditions, and their impact on the material's wear performance. [8-11].
In the study, commercially available 99.9% pure Mg with an average particle size of 150 microns and hard ceramic reinforcement, TiO2 nanoparticulate with an average particle size of a hydraulic press. In a microwave furnace, the green compacts are heat-treated using a two-stage hybrid sintering process. Finally, the heat-treated specimens are extruded and machined to the desired dimensions and good surface finish. Wear experiments on a pin-on-disc wear testing machine (provided by Ducom Instruments Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India) were conducted to investigate the wear behaviour of Mg-TiO2 nanocomposite in accordance with ASTM standard G99-055. The wear tests were conducted at room temperature in a dry running atmosphere. The wear test specimens have a diameter of 8 mm and a length of 30 mm. The wear testing machine used these specimens as pins, while the counter disc was a standard material oil-hardened non-shrinking die steel (OHNS) with a diameter of 160 mm and a thickness of 8 mm, and a hardness of 57-60 HRC. 21 nm was used. Powder metallurgy was used to create the necessary workpiece specimens. The steps in this procedure are as follows: Using a planetary-type ball mill, the pure Mg and tiny TiO2 particles are first thoroughly mixed. For blending purposes, a mechanical alloying approach was used in a ball mill with a rotating speed of around 300 rpm. The mixed powders are then loaded into the die and compressed iso-statically with a 950 MPa iso-static pressure using a 100-ton The weight percent of reinforcement, sliding speed, and the normal load were chosen as input process parameters for the study. [5-10] Throughout the tests, the sliding distance and wear track diameter are kept constant at 1500 m and 90 mm, respectively. Cumulative wear (in microns) and coefficient of friction were the study's performance indicators. [5-10] Each experiment was done three times to confirm that the results were consistent. Table 1 lists the process parameters that were investigated in the study, as well as their levels. The L9 orthogonal array was chosen for the investigation because it has three elements, each with three levels. A flowchart in Fig. 1 depicts the step-by-step Taguchi Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) approach for improving the process parameters. [7-8] The L9 orthogonal array was chosen for the investigation because it has three elements, each with three levels.
Table 1. Process parameters and their levels
Process parameter |
Levels |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
A - wt% of TiO2 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
5 |
B – Normal load (kg) |
0.5 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
C - sliding speed (m/s) |
1.5 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
Output measures–cumulative wear (µm) & coefficient of friction |
Fig. 1. Step-by-step procedure of Taguchi Grey Relational Analysis
Tables 2 and 3 provided the results of each trial, including S/N ratios, normalized S/N ratios, deviation sequence, grey relational coefficient, and grey relational grade. Table 2 also showed the grey relational grade, which was used to rank the investigations. As shown in Fig. 1, the different responses to this investigation, such as cumulative wear and coefficient of friction were combined into a single response, grey relational grade. Grey relational grade was the objective function in Taguchi-based Grey relational analysis (GRG). For this sliding wear behaviour, both cumulative wear and coefficient of friction were minimized in this work.
Table 2. S/N and normalized S/N of responses
S. No. |
Factors |
Responses |
S/N of responses |
||||||
A |
B |
C |
Cumulative wear (µm) |
Coefficient of friction |
Cumulative wear (µm) |
Coefficient of friction |
Cumulative wear (µm) |
Coefficient of friction |
|
1 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
11.33 |
0.52 |
-21.085 |
5.680 |
0.880 |
0.000 |
2 |
1.5 |
1 |
2 |
25.33 |
0.38 |
-28.073 |
8.404 |
0.460 |
0.667 |
3 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
29.33 |
0.32 |
-29.346 |
9.897 |
0.340 |
0.952 |
4 |
2.5 |
0.5 |
2 |
14.67 |
0.41 |
-23.329 |
7.744 |
0.780 |
0.524 |
5 |
2.5 |
1 |
2.5 |
40.67 |
0.37 |
-32.185 |
8.636 |
0.000 |
0.714 |
6 |
2.5 |
2 |
1.5 |
37.33 |
0.34 |
-31.441 |
9.370 |
0.100 |
0.857 |
7 |
5 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
7.33 |
0.47 |
-17.302 |
6.558 |
1.000 |
0.238 |
8 |
5 |
1 |
1.5 |
25.33 |
0.31 |
-28.073 |
10.173 |
0.460 |
1.000 |
9 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
0.33 |
-26.021 |
9.630 |
0.620 |
0.905 |
Table 3. Grey Relational Grades and ranks of responses
S. No. |
Factors |
Deviation Sequences |
Grey Relational Coefficient |
Grey Relational Grade, Gi |
Rank |
||||
A |
B |
C |
Cumulative wear (µm) |
Coefficient of friction |
Cumulative wear (µm) |
Coefficient of friction |
|||
1 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
0.120 |
1.000 |
0.893 |
0.500 |
0.696 |
8 |
2 |
1.5 |
1 |
2 |
0.540 |
0.333 |
0.649 |
0.750 |
0.700 |
7 |
3 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
0.660 |
0.048 |
0.602 |
0.955 |
0.779 |
4 |
4 |
2.5 |
0.5 |
2 |
0.220 |
0.476 |
0.820 |
0.677 |
0.748 |
5 |
5 |
2.5 |
1 |
2.5 |
1.000 |
0.286 |
0.500 |
0.778 |
0.639 |
9 |
6 |
2.5 |
2 |
1.5 |
0.900 |
0.143 |
0.526 |
0.875 |
0.701 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
0.000 |
0.762 |
1.000 |
0.568 |
0.784 |
3 |
8 |
5 |
1 |
1.5 |
0.540 |
0.000 |
0.649 |
1.000 |
0.825 |
1 |
9 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
0.380 |
0.095 |
0.725 |
0.913 |
0.819 |
2 |
The initial ideal combination of process parameters for the maximum grey relational grade is A3B2C1, according to the rank determined for the grey relational grade presented in tables 4 and 5. Using the relationship presented in Fig. 1, the anticipated grey relational grade for this combination of optimum design parameters was 0.8438. This was taken a step further by putting it to the test. The computed grey relational grade was 0.8314, which was almost identical to the projected value, based on the testing findings of the optimum design parameters. In terms of original design parameters, the improvement in grey relational grade in predicted and experimental were 2.2 % and 0.77 %, respectively.
Table 4. Ranks for factors at all levels
Factors |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Delta |
Rank |
A |
0.725 |
0.696 |
0.809 |
0.113 |
1 |
B |
0.742 |
0.721 |
0.766 |
0.045 |
2 |
C |
0.74 |
0.755 |
0.734 |
0.021 |
3 |
Table 5. GRG for initial and optimum design parameters
Confirmation Experiment |
Initial Design Parameters |
Optimum Design Parameters |
|
Predicted |
Experimental |
||
Setting level |
A3B2C1 |
A3B3C2 |
A3B3C2 |
Grey Relational Grade (GRG) |
0.825 |
0.8438 |
0.8314 |
Improvement in GRG |
2.2% |
0.77% |
The grey relational grades for all factors at all levels and all the experiments are shown in Fig. 2 and 3 respectively. The numerous performance features of the wear behaviour of the Mg-TiO2 nanocomposite were greatly enhanced, as evidenced by the improvement in grey relational grade. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to look into the important process parameters that affected the composite's wear behaviour The ANOVA results for output performance characteristics like cumulative wear and coefficient of friction are shown in tables 6 and 7 respectively. The residual plots for the performance measures cumulative wear and coefficient of friction were shown in Fig. 3 and 4. The estimated R-Sq. for cumulative wear and coefficient of friction are 77.08% and 64.11% respectively. The residual plots complement the results of R-Sq. It was observed from the ANOVA tables that, the most influencing factor was the normal load for both the performance measures. The contribution of the normal load is 68.9% in the case of cumulative wear, whereas 27.4% is for a coefficient of friction. The subsequent influencing factor on the output measures was sliding speed. The Highest F-ratio and P-value in the ANOVA tables of performance measures support the justification for the contribution made by the most influencing process parameter of the study. [12-15]
The sample surface plots shown in Fig. 6 and 7 generated for the output measures against normal load and weight fraction of the reinforcement keeping the sliding speed at the constant of about 2 m/s. The level of influence discussed previously was confirmed through these surface plots also.
The higher-order regression model for the responses is given below:
Cumulative wear =
35.85+0.8216A+9.01B+1.39C+0.0542AB-1.43AC-
0.6914BC-2.32A2-14.75B2+1.33C2
Coefficient of friction =
0.3708-0.0058A-0.0476B+0.0094C
Table 6. ANOVA for the response – cumulative wear
Source |
DOF |
Adjusted Sum of squares |
Adjusted mean of squares |
F-ratio |
P-value |
Percentage of contribution |
A |
2 |
92.94 |
46.468 |
3.27 |
0.092 |
2.27 |
B |
2 |
1390.15 |
695.073 |
48.91 |
0.0001 |
68.93 |
C |
2 |
56.96 |
28.478 |
2.00 |
0.197 |
3.57 |
A X B |
4 |
27.97 |
6.993 |
0.49 |
0.742 |
-0.33 |
A X C |
4 |
108.06 |
27.016 |
1.90 |
0.204 |
-0.65 |
B X C |
4 |
300.37 |
75.093 |
5.28 |
0.022 |
8.26 |
Error |
8 |
113.69 |
14.211 |
|
|
17.93 |
Total |
26 |
2090.13 |
|
|
|
100 |
Table 7. ANOVA for the response – coefficient of friction
Source |
DOF |
Adjusted Sum of squares |
Adjusted mean of squares |
F-ratio |
P-value |
Percentage of contribution |
A |
2 |
0.0146 |
0.0073 |
6.99 |
0.018 |
10.60 |
B |
2 |
0.0398 |
0.0199 |
18.96 |
0.001 |
27.46 |
C |
2 |
0.0116 |
0.0058 |
5.53 |
0.031 |
7.30 |
A X B |
4 |
0.0155 |
0.0038 |
3.70 |
0.054 |
7.11 |
A X C |
4 |
0.0018 |
0.0004 |
0.43 |
0.781 |
-2.70 |
B X C |
4 |
0.0479 |
0.0119 |
11.42 |
0.002 |
30.28 |
Error |
8 |
0.0084 |
0.0010 |
|
|
19.92 |
Total |
26 |
0.1398 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Fig. 2. Grey Relational Grades for the factors at all levels |
|
Fig. 3. Grey Relational Grades for all experiments |
|
Fig. 4. Residual plots for cumulative wear |
|
Fig. 5. Residual plots for the coefficient of friction |
|
Fig. 6. Surface plot at 2 m/s sliding velocity for cumulative wear |
|
Fig. 7. Surface plot at 2 m/s sliding velocity for the coefficient of friction |
In this study, Taguchi-based Grey relational analysis was used to optimize the wear behaviour of Mg-TiO2 nanocomposite's numerous performance aspects. This optimization technique combines numerous performance criteria into a single grey relational grade performance metric. The highest grey relational grade obtained for an experiment depicts the best process parameter settings, which were further confirmed through experimentation. The investigation came up with the following conclusions.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.
References
[1] Aatthisugan, I., Razal Rose, A. and Selwyn Jebadurai., 2017. Mechanical and wear behaviour of AZ91D magnesium matrix hybrid composite reinforced with boron carbide and graphite. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 1, pp.20–25.
[2] Asal., 2019. Optimization of surface roughness in turning of AZ31 magnesium alloys with Taguchi method. Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation, 6(1), pp.25–32.
[3] Bi, G., Li, Y., Huang, X., Chen, T., Ma, Y. and Hao, Y., 2015. Dry sliding wear behaviour of an extruded Mg-Dy-Zn alloy with long-period stacking ordered phase. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 3(1), pp.63–69.
[4] Ganesh, R., Chandrasekaran, K., Mohammed Ameen, and Raja Pavan Kumar., 2014. Optimization of the process parameters for dry sliding wear of an Al2219 – SiCp composite using the Taguchi based Grey Relational Analysis. Materials and Technology, 48(3), pp.361-366.
[5] Girish, B.M., Satish, B.M., Sarapure, S., Somashekar, D.R. and Basawaraj., 2015. Wear behavior of magnesium alloy AZ91 hybrid composite materials, Tribology Transactions, 58 (3), pp.481–489.
[6] Wong, WLE. And Gupta, M., 2015. Using Microwave Energy to Synthesize Light Weight/Energy Saving Magnesium Based Materials: A Review. Technologies, 3(1), pp. 1–18
[7] Gopal, PM. and Soorya Prakash, K., 2018. Minimization of cutting force, temperature and surface roughness through GRA, TOPSIS and Taguchi techniques in end milling of Mg hybrid MMC. Measurement, 116, pp.178–192.
[8] Ramesh, S., Viswanathan, R. and Ambika, S., 2016. Measurement and optimization of surface roughness and tool wear via grey relational analysis, TOPSIS and RSA techniques. Measurement, 78, pp.63-72.
[9] Hu, M., Wang, Q., Chen, C., Yin, D., Ding, W. and Ji, Z., 2012. Dry sliding wear behaviour of Mg 10Gd-3Y-0.4Zr alloy. Materials and Design, 42, pp.223–229.
[10] Narayanasamy, P. and Selvakumar, N., 2017. Tensile, compressive and wear behaviour of self-lubricating sintered magnesium-based composites, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 27(2), pp.312–323.
[11] Elumalai, P, C. and Ganesh, R., 2021. Investigation on dry sliding wear behavior of titanium dioxide reinforced magnesium matrix composite, Surface Review and letters, 28(11), pp. 2150106.
[12] Sahu, P.K. and Pal, S., 2015. Multi-response optimization of process parameters in friction stir welded AM20 magnesium alloy by Taguchi grey relational analysis. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 3(1), pp.36–46.
[13] Seenuvasaperumal, P. and Elayaperumal, A., 2017. Effect of calcium hexaboride particles on predicting the dry sliding tribological process parameter of magnesium composite using grey relational analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(2), pp.557–566.
[14] Ganesh, R., Ram Subbaiah. and Chandrasekaran, K., 2015. Dry sliding wear behavior of powder metallurgy aluminium matrix composite. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2(4-5), pp.1441–1449.
[15] Ganesh, R., Neshan, DKS., Rajendra Prasad, K. and Chandrasekaran, K., 2014. Modeling and optimization of the wear performance of aluminium metal matrix composite using Response Surface Methodology. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 592, pp.1336-1340.